Skip to main content

Table 4 Factors associated with perceiving cannabidiol as harmful or not (multinomial logistic regression, with ‘no opinion’ as reference)

From: Cannabidiol use and perceptions in France: a national survey

Variables

Cannabidiol is not harmful1

(n = 397)

Cannabidiol is harmful1

(n = 636)

 

aRRR [95% CI]

P-value

aRRR [95% CI]

P-value

Age (in years)

0.98 [0.97—0.99]

 < 10–3

0.99 [0.98 – 1.00]

0.007

Gender

 Men

1

 

1

 

 Women

1.40 [1.01—1.94]

0.044

0.90 [0.67—1.19]

0.453

Country of birth

 France

1

 

1

 

 Elsewhere

0.43 [0.22—0.87]

0.018

0.53 [0.29—0.95]

0.032

Alcohol use2

 Never

1

0.002

1

0.151

 Occasional

1.19 [0.82—1.72]

0.368

1.13 [0.81—1.57]

0.479

 Regular

2.25 [1.41—3.57]

0.001

1.51 [0.99—2.30]

0.057

Cannabis use

 No

1

 

1

 

 Yes

8.21 [2.80—24.06]

 < 10–3

5.52 [1.95—15.65]

0.001

‘Alternative medicines provide better solutions to health problems than conventional medicines’

 Disagree

1

 < 10–3

1

0.001

 Agree

1.26 [0.81—1.95]

0.301

1.21 [0.81—1.81]

0.351

 No opinion

0.57 [0.38—0.84]

0.005

0.64 [0.45—0.92]

0.015

Preferred means to obtain information

 Television

1

0.005

1

0.017

 Radio

1.33 [0.79—2.24]

0.284

1.21 [0.74—1.97]

0.443

 Print media

0.47 [0.26—0.86]

0.014

0.65 [0.40—1.07]

0.088

 Online media

1.80 [1.04—3.10]

0.035

1.58 [0.95—2.62]

0.079

 Other internet3

1.47 [0.93—2.33]

0.098

1.53 [1.00—2.33]

0.049

 Close family members and friends

1.10 [0.69—1.73]

0.691

1.42 [0.95—2.12]

0.089

  1. aRRR adjusted relative risk ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. 1 Not at all harmful vs. a little harmful, quite harmful, and very harmful
  3. 2 Never vs. occasional (less than once a week or around once a week) vs. regular (several times a week or every day or almost every day)
  4. 3 Non-media websites and social networks