Skip to main content

Table 2 Factors associated with having heard of cannabidiol and factors associated with its use (binary logistic regression, multivariable analysis)

From: Cannabidiol use and perceptions in France: a national survey

Variable

Having heard of cannabidiol

(N = 1953)

Cannabidiol use

(N = 1948)

 

aOR [95% CI]

P-value

aOR [95% CI]

P-value

Age (in years)

0.97 [0.96—0.98]

 < 10–3

0.98 [0.97—0.99]

 < 10–3

Country of birth

 France

1

   

 Elsewhere

0.55 [0.35 – 0.87]

0.010

  

Socio-professional status

 Farmer/ craftsperson, trader or business manager/ skilled or unskilled worker

1

0.022

  

 Executive or higher intellectual profession/ Intermediate profession

0.60 [0.43—0.85]

0.004

  

 Employee

0.81 [0.57—1.16]

0.258

  

 Pensioner

0.72 [0.49—1.07]

0.108

  

 Other, no professional activity

0.45 [0.28—0.70]

0.001

  

Tobacco use

 No

1

 

1

 

 Yes

1.38 [1.05—1.82]

0.021

2.82 [1.93—4.11]

 < 10–3

Cannabis use

 No

1

 

1

 

 Yes

2.18 [1.14—4.17]

0.019

7.53 [4.66—12.16]

 < 10–3

Self-reported general health status 1

 Good

  

1

0.001

 Quite good

  

1.43 [0.95—2.15]

0.088

 Poor

  

2.68 [1.60—4.49]

 < 10–3

‘Alternative medicines provide better solutions to health problems than conventional medicines’

 Disagree

  

1

0.001

 Agree

  

1.64 [1.03—2.58]

0.035

No opinion

  

0.81 [0.50—1.32]

0.400

  1. aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. 1Very good or good vs. quite good vs. poor and very poor