Table 5 Discrimination performance of CVD risk assessment tools according to (AUC) metric

Collins et al. (2010) [17]

Framingham risk score

0.75 (0.747 to 0.753)

0.774 (0.771 to 0.777)

QRISK1®

0.771 (0.768 to 0.774)

0.799 (0.796 to 0.802)

QRISK2®

0.773 (0.770 to 0.776)

0.801 (0.798 to 0.804)

Collins et al. (2009) [25]

Framingham risk score

0.752 (0.749 to 0.755)

0.770 (0.766 to 0.774)

QRISK1®

0.762 (0.759 to 0.765)

0.789 (0.785 to 0.793)

Hippisley-Cox et al. (2008) [18]

Framingham risk score

0.779 (0.776 to 0.782)

0.800 (0.797 to 0.803)

QRISK1®

0.788 (0.786 to 0.791)

0.814 (0.811 to 0.817)

QRISK2®

0.792 (0.789 to 0.794)

0.817 (0.814 to 0.820)

Hippisley-Cox et al. (2007) [10]

Framingham risk score

0.759 (0.756 to 0.764)

0.774 (0.771 to 0.778)

QRISK1®

0.767 (0.763 to 0.772)

0.788 (0.785 to 0.791)

ASSIGN

0.764 (0.760 to 0.769)

0.784 (0.781 to 0.787)