Skip to main content

Table 3 The associations between psychosocial, behavioural and environmental factors and PA in adolescentsb

From: Exploring the intersectionality of family SES and gender with psychosocial, behavioural and environmental correlates of physical activity in Dutch adolescents: a cross-sectional study

  

Ba

95% CI

Behavioural factors

 Model 1

Lack of daily fruit consumption (ref. = daily consumption)

− 0.48

− 0.57

− 0.39

 Model 2

Lack of daily vegetable consumption (ref. = daily consumption)

− 0.33

− 0.43

− 0.25

 Model 3

Lack of daily water drinking (ref. = daily consumption)

− 0.44

−0.53

− 0.35

 Model 4

Lack of daily breakfast consumption (ref. = daily consumption)

−0.33

−0.42

− 0.24

 Model 5

Risk of problematic social media use (ref. = no risk)

−0.34

−0.46

− 0.21

 Model 6

Risk of problematic gaming (ref. = no risk)

−0.53

−0.69

− 0.35

 Model 7

Daily smoking (ref. = not smoker)

−0.31

−0.52

− 0.11

 Model 8

Cannabis use in the last 4 weeks (ref. = no use)

−0.21

− 0.41

−0.01

 Model 9

Binge drinking (ref. = no binge drinking)

0.03

−0.09

0.15

Psychosocial factors

 Model 10

Poor self-perceived health (ref. = good)

−0.50

− 0.63

−0.37

 Model 11

Low peer social support (ref. = high)

−0.71

−0.86

− 0.56

Environmental factors

 Model 12

Weak connection with the neighbourhood (ref. = strong)

−0.21

−0.35

− 0.08

  1. a Bold beta indicates statistical difference in mean PA relative to reference category (p < 0.05)
  2. b Each model was adjusted for gender, age, migration background, educational level, municipality and family SES