Skip to main content

Table 1 Association between teacher’s characteristics, training experience, performance of their school coordinators and mentors and number of core activities and sessions taught in the classroom among 79 grade six school teachers in 2019–2020

From: Comparing standard versus enhanced implementation of an evidence-based HIV prevention program among Bahamian sixth grade students: findings from nationwide implementation trials

Variables

n

Number of core activities completed (0–35)

Number of core activities taught exactly as outlined in the manual (0–35)

Number of sessions taught (0–9)

Total years as teacher or guidance counselor

 1 ~ 5 years

9

28.6(4.6)

25.1(4.0)

6.9(2.0)

 6 ~ 10 years

18

29.7(4.9)

23.9(6.4)

7.5(1.4)

  > 10 years

50

27.5(5.5)

21.8(7.4)

7.0(1.6)

 F test

 

1.12

1.25

0.73

Education level

 Associate degree/teaching certificate

4

26.5(1.7)

19.3(8.7)

6.5(1.0)

 Bachelor degree

60

28.1(5.7)

23.1(7.0)

7.0(1.6)

 Master degree

12

28.8(4.4)

22.5(5.6)

7.9(1.6)

 F test

 

0.28

0.60

1.97

Attended a FOYC training workshop

 Yes

64

28.1(5.6)

22.4(7.2)

7.0(1.7)

 No

15

29.3(4.0)

24.4(5.1)

7.9(1.1)

 t test

 

−0.79

−1.02

− 1.95

Prior experience of teaching HIV risk reduction intervention

 Yes

12

29.6(3.0)

23.9(7.0)

7.3(1.5)

 No

65

28.0(5.7)

22.4(6.9)

7.1(1.6)

 t test

 

1.43

0.69

0.37

Having other teaching priorities

 Yes

27

28.3(6.1)

22.6(6.5)

6.9(1.8)

 No

44

28.5(4.9)

23.3(7.1)

7.3(1.5)

 t test

 

−0.22

−0.41

−1.00

Importance of FOYC for the grade six students in your school

 Very important

72

28.1(5.4)

22.3(6.9)

7.1(1.6)

 Somewhat important

5

29.8(4.8)

26.8(4.4)

7.2(2.2)

 t test

 

−0.70

−1.43

−0.16

FOYC is a Bahamian curriculum

 Very much so

49

27.6(5.7)

22.4(7.4)

6.9(1.6)

 Somewhat

26

28.9(4.6)

22.3(5.7)

7.5(1.4)

 t test

 

−1.04

0.07

− 1.74

Performance of school coordinators

 Satisfactory

16

22.3(6.4)

18.5(8.1)

6.4(1.7)

 Very good

47

29.6(3.7)

24.4(6.2)

7.1(1.6)

 Excellent

16

30.4(4.1)

22.2(5.8)

7.9(1.1)

 F test

 

18.54***

5.01**

3.77*

Performance of mentors

 No mentors/satisfactory

59

27.6(5.8)

22.3(7.1)

6.9(1.6)

 Very good

20

30.4(2.6)

24.3(5.8)

7.8(1.6)

 T test

 

−2.96**

−1.16

−2.01*

  1. Note: * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001