Key findings | |
• Offering COVID-19 tests in university residences is viewed positively, with broad uptake and reach. | |
• Testing engagement is high (88%), compliance with twice-weekly testing is lower (46%). | |
• The concept of surge testing is seen to be an acceptable outbreak mitigation strategy. | |
• Regularly testing contacts of positive cases is perceived to be preferable to self-isolation. | |
• The concept of surge testing is seen to be an acceptable outbreak mitigation strategy. | |
• Relaxed social restrictions improve student satisfaction and mental health. | |
• Most students are compliant with residence-based COVID-19 social regulations but those who are not create challenges and stressors for peers and staff. | |
• Responding to the changing landscape of a pandemic is challenging for staff. | |
Key recommendations to maximise uptake, adherence and compliance | |
• Written communications for students should be briefer, empathetic, positive and persuasive but avoid punitive tone. | |
• Students require clear and specific rules outlining expectations around social distancing, mask wearing and socialising, with explanations for changes. | |
• Communications should be delivered consistently across all staff groups to avoid mixed messages. | |
• Timings for kit collection and sample drop-off need to be accessible around meals and academic commitments. | |
• Involving students in programme planning is essential to ensure procedures and communications match the needs of the student population. | |
• Involving staff with student-facing roles in programme planning is essential to establish clear lines of communication and to ensure procedures are practical and achievable. | |
• Student ambassadors are a useful mechanism for provision of peer-to-peer support and assistance with communications. | |
• Regular updates on testing uptake rates are valued by and motivate students. | |
• Normalising residence-based testing will be important for future uptake of surveillance testing during a pandemic. |