Programme implementation questions used to guide the documentation of programme implementation | Process Evaluation Data Sources | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Testing Service | Quantitative | Qualitative | ||||
RB-TPP Engagement and design | RB-TPP Implementation | Student Survey | Student Ambassadora Interviews | Staff Interviews | Student Participant Focus Groups | |
Programme design | ||||||
1. Who were the target participants? What was the uptake and reach? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
2. What were the target settings? Did settings change over time? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
3. What theoretical model/theory-of-change were the strategies based on? | ✓ | |||||
3. What essential elements were to be delivered in the programme? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Testing service provision | ||||||
4. What selection process was used to identify the provider? What were the credentials of providers? | ✓ | |||||
5. What information did the testing service providers communicate to students (what was the content and format, and were there any changes over time?) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Recruitment to RB-TPP | ||||||
6. How were students recruited as participants? | ✓ | |||||
7. What was the nature of the relationship between the student participants and the researchers or institutions involved in the programme? | ✓ | |||||
Tailoring, messaging, incentives | ||||||
8. Which behavioural components are selected? | ✓ | |||||
9. What are the reasons for that selection? (what goals are targeted)? | ✓ | |||||
10. What, if any, other goals and strategies are proposed by programme leaders and ambassadors supporting uptake, engagement and adherence? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Programme delivery | ||||||
11. What method was used to specify and direct the implementation? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
12. How long were participants involved? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
13. What were the testing and social behaviour expectations? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
14. To what extent were the essential elements delivered? How were they monitored/measured? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
15. Were there any planned changes made to the RB-TPP while it was in progress? Why? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
16. Were there any unplanned changes? What happened? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Context | ||||||
17. What was the culture and overarching context of the participating agencies at the start of the intervention? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
18. Were there any changes/initiatives during the programme that may have affected responses to the intervention? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
19. What were the immediate contextual conditions around the testing? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Participation | ||||||
20. Who was invited to participate: numbers, locations, campuses, institution(s)? | ✓ | |||||
21. How many potential students engaged in RB-TPP? Who were they? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
22. What proportion of targeted students engaged (one PCR test) or were fully compliant (all PCR tests offered)1? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
23. Did key people (public health leaders or topic specialists) support or advocate the programme? | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Responses to programme activities | ||||||
24. How did students participate in components of the programme? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
25. How satisfied were participants with components of RB-TPP? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
26. Did students or staff identify or anticipate any changes in response to RB-TPP programme activities? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Intervention improvements | ||||||
27. What improvements to the intervention design and/or implementation are suggested by this data? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
29. What lessons might be relevant to other interventions and settings? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |