Table 2 Basic Information about the Instruments
From: Instruments to measure e-cigarette related constructs: a systematic review
Instrument | Author & year | Country | Age range | Theory | Mode of administration | Completion time | Final number of items | Response options |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adolescent E-Cigarette Consequences Questionnaire (AECQ) | Cristello et al., 2020 [19] | USA | High school students (Mean = 14.90) | NR | In person | NRa | 18 | 1–5 Likert |
Electronic cigarette attitudes survey (ECAS) | Diez et al., 2019 [30] | USA | 14–19 | NR | In-person | NRa | 12 | 1–5 Likert |
Sensory E-cigarette Expectancies Scale (SEES) | Morean et al., 2019 [20] | USA | ≥18 | NR | Online | NRa | 9 | 1–5 Likert |
E-cigarette Fagerström Test of Cigarette Dependence (e-FTCD) | Piper et al., 2019 [36] | USA | ≥18 | NR | NR | NR | 6 | NR |
E-cigarette Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (e-WISDM) | Piper et al., 2019 [36] | USA | ≥18 | NR | NR | NR | 37 | NR |
Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PS-ECDI). | USA | ≥18 | NR | Online | NR | 10 | Mixed | |
Questionnaire of Vaping Craving (QVC) | Dowd et al., 2019 [35] | USA | ≥18 | NR | Online | > 10 min. | 10 | 1–7 Likert |
Susceptibility to future use | Cole et al., 2019 [32] | Canada | 14–17b | NR | NR | NR | 3 | NR |
Revised youth EC outcome expectancies | Pokhrel et al., 2018 [18] | USA | 18–25 | Motivation Theories | NR | NR | 43 | 1–10 Likert |
Revised youth EC outcome expectancies (Short version) | Pokhrel et al., 2018 [18] | USA | 18–25 | Motivation Theories | NR | NR | 12 | 1–10 Likert |
Self-report habit index (SRHI e-cigarette) | Morean et al., 2018 [34] | USA | ≥18 | NR | Online | NR | 12 | 1–2 Likert |
Susceptibility to four product classes (EC, cigars, hookah and cigarettes) | Carey et al., 2018 [33] | USA | 10–18 | NR | Online | NRa | 3 | 1–4 Likert |
Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence applied to Vaping (FTND-V) | Browne & Todd, 2018 [38] | Australia | ≥17 | NR | Online | NR | 9 | Mixed |
Comparing EC and Cigarettes Questionnaire (CEAC) | USA; England | ≥18 | Theory of Planned Behavior | Online | NR | 10 | 1–5 Likert | |
Perceived harms and social norms in the use of e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco | Waters et al., 2017 [28] | USA | ≥18 | Theory of planned behavior & integrated model of behavior change | Online | NR | 15 | 1–9 Likert |
Perceived harm of EC and smokeless tobacco with cigarettes | Persoskie et al., 2017 [27] | USA | 12–17 | NR | NR | NR | 2 | 1–4 Likert |
Risk and Benefits of E-cigarettes (RABE) | Copeland et al., 2017 [22] | USA | ≥18 | NR | Online | NR | 30 | 1–7 Likert |
Short Form Vaping Consequences Questionnaire (S-VCQ) | Morean & L’Insalata, 2017 [21] | USA | ≥18 | Social learning theory | Online | NR | 21 | NR |
Motivations of intention to try EC among non-EC users | Penzes et al., 2016 [31] | Hungary | ≥18 | NR | Online | NR | 27 | 1–4 Likert |
Nicotine and Other Substance Interaction Expectancies-E-cig Revised version (NOSIE-ER) | Hershberger et al.,2016 [29] | USA | ≥21 | NR | Online | NR | 8 | True/False |
e-cigarette-specific Brief Smoking Consequences Questionnaire (e-cigarette-specific BSCQ-A) | Hendricks et al., 2015 [26] | USA | ≥19 | Expectancy theory | Online | NR | 25 | 0–9 Likert |
Conditional Risk Assessment | Chaffee et al., 2015 [23] | USA | 13–18 | Social learning theory & health belief model | Online | NR | 19 | NR |