Skip to main content

Table 8 Association between TCB-victimizationa clusters and psychological distressb (n = 1,200)

From: Prevalence, characteristics, and psychological outcomes of workplace cyberbullying during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a cross-sectional online survey

 

Step 1

Step 2

 

OR

(95% CI)

OR

(95% CI)

Female (ref. male)

1.10

(0.85–1.42)

1.55

(1.14–2.10)

Age

0.98

(0.97–0.99)

0.99

(0.97–0.999)

Cluster Y (ref. cluster X)

6.46

(4.28–9.75)

3.70

(2.37–5.80)

Cluster Z (ref. cluster X)

16.92

(6.06–47.29)

12.63

(4.20–38.03)

Active dissemination via SNSs, blog, or video sharing site, Yes (ref. No)

1.85

(1.16–2.93)

Extraversion

  

0.92

(0.87–0.98)

Agreeableness

  

0.89

(0.82–0.95)

Neuroticism

 

1.23

(1.15–1.31)

Qualitative workload

  

2.13

(1.76–2.59)

Support from colleagues and superiors

  

0.63

(0.51–0.79)

Tradition scale

  

1.11

(1.03–1.21)

Gratitude for meaningful work

  

0.76

(0.64–0.91)

Nagelkerke R2

0.18

0.40

  1. aTCB Traditional and cyber bullying
  2. bDefined by the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, with total score 5 or more
  3. Statistical analyses were conducted using hierarchical binomial logistic regression with forward selection (likelihood ratio)