Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations between neighborhood variables

From: Associations between neighborhood built, social, or toxicant conditions and child externalizing behaviors in the Detroit metro area: a cross-sectional study of the neighborhood ‘exposome’

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1. Number non-profits

.25**

0.05

.44**

.14**

0.03

.13**

−0.18**

−.20**

2. Number churches

.55**

− 0.01

.25**

.18**

0.05

−0.03

−.14**

−.09*

3. Sum toxicants

.08*

−0.01

0.07

0.04

− 0.02

.25**

0.04

−.00

4. Number alcohol outlets

.72**

.65**

0.04

.55**

−0.04

.15**

−.33**

−.19**

5. Number pre1978 structures

.33**

.44**

−0.04

.81**

0.02

.11**

−.33**

−.14**

6. Percent green space area

−.20**

−.20**

−0.05

−.23**

−.17**

.22**

−.14**

.13**

7. Percent industrial area

.27**

.13**

.49**

.33**

.20**

−.12**

−.11**

.14**

8. Percent agricultural area

−.41**

−.40**

−.13**

−.59**

−.42**

−.09*

−.36**

.14**

9. Percent vacant lots

−.31**

−.25**

.27**

−.33**

−.25**

.12**

.09*

0.01

  1. Correlations among raw variables. *p < .05, **p < .01; 5 km below the diagonal and 1 km above the diagonal (in bold). Poverty and area deprivation index not included, as these were measured at the Census tract and block group levels, respectively