Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimated total effect and standardised mediator effect (proportion eliminated by mediation) from included studies (n = 22)

From: Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review

Paper

Effect of SES on PTB (95% confidence interval if available)

Mediator

Prevalence of mediator in sample

Proportion eliminated (95% confidence interval if available)

Poulsen et al. (2019) [33] Denmark

Total effect RD: 2.0 (1.4, 2.5) excess PTB/100 singleton deliveries

Smoking

17% total; 39% short education, 8% long

22% (11%, 31%)a

Poulsen et al. (2019) [33] Netherlands

Total effect RD: 3.2 (0.8, 5.2)

19% total; 41% short education, 7% long

10% (-22%, 29%)

Poulsen et al. (2019) [33] Norway

Total effect RD: 2.0 (0.9, 3.0)

9% total; 34% short education, 4% long

19% (-1%, 29%)a

Ross et al. (2019) [34]

Direct coefficient: 0.072* Total effect coefficient 0.077

Pre-eclampsia

5% in black women, 3% in white women

6.5%a

Dolatian et al. (2014) [35]

Direct coefficient: 0.06* Total effect coefficient: 0.06126*

Perceived stress

Mean

11.8%a

Perceived social support through stress

Mean

Mediated effect in opposite directiona

Combined

 

2.1%a

Clayborne et al. (2017) [36]

Total effect OR: 0.91 (0.64, 1.31)

Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI)

Mean

Cannot be estimated

Gestational weight gain

Mean

Cannot be estimated

Combined

 

Cannot be estimateda

Dooley (2009) [37] (PhD thesis)

Direct effect: 43.29% increase in odds/standard deviation increase. Total effect**: 46.01%*

Medical risk

13%

2.9%a

Smoking

13%

3.0%a

Perceived neighbourhood support

Mean

No indirect effect

Mehra et al. (2019) [38]

Direct effect coefficient: 0.036. Total effect coefficient: 0.059*

Hypertension

10%

22.0%a

Infection

28%

16.9%a

Meng et al. (2013) [39]

Total effect coefficient: 0.981 (0.626–1.337)

SES-related support

Composite measure

11.7%a

Psychosocial

Composite measure

2.1%a

Behavioural

Composite measure

5.5%a

Health

Composite measure

6.4%a

Mirabzadeh et al. (2013) [40]

Total effect coefficient: 0.1441a

Perceived social support through stress

Mean

8.1%a

Stress, depression, and anxiety

Mean

22.5%a

Combined

 

30.6%a

Misra et al. (2001) [41]

Total effect OR: 2.85 (1.85–4.40)

Psychosocial factors only

26% severe stress

44%

Biomedical and psychosocial factors

5% chronic disease

64%

Nkansah-Amankra et al. (2010) [42]

Total effect OR 1.34 (0.80–2.25)

Maternal stress (emotional, financial, spousal-related, traumatic)

14% low poverty, 57% high poverty

No significant total effect

Räisänen et al. (2013) [43]

Total effect OR: Extremely PTB 1.61 (1.38–1.89); Very PTB 1.48 (1.31–1.68); Moderately PTB 1.27 (1.22–1.32)

Smoking

12% to 18% by gestational age category

26% for extremely PTB 33% for very PTB 30% for moderately PTB

Other factors and smoking

Composite measure

39% for extremely PTB 50% for very PTB 41% for moderately PTB

Ahern et al. (2003) [44] African-American

Total effect parameter estimate proportion unemployed: 44.4*

Cigarettes per day

Mean

3%

Ahern et al. (2003) [44] White

Total effect parameter estimate change in unemployed: -3.32

No significant total effect

Amegah et al. (2013) [45]

Total effect RR: 1.83 (1.31–2.56)

Malaria infection during pregnancy

48%

No effect

Pre-pregnancy BMI

33% healthy weight

17%

Cooking fuel used

18% LPG, 24% charcoal, 5% firewood

22%

Combined

 

30%

van den Berg et al. (2012) [46]

Total effect OR: 1.95 (1.19–3.20)

Smoking

7% total, 33% in low educated, 2% in high educated

43%

Smoking and environmental tobacco exposure

6% total, 27% in low educated, 1% in high educated

39%

Morgen et al. (2008) [47]

HR primiparous: 1.22 (1.04–1.42) HR multiparous: 1.56 (1.31–1.87)

Smoking

26% to 35% by gestational age category

5% in primiparous 23% in multiparous

Alcohol

40% to 45% by gestational age category

5% in primiparous 4% in multiparous

Binge drinking

25% to 26% by gestational age category

5% in primiparous no effect in multiparous

Pre-pregnancy BMI

Mean

9% in primiparous 2% in multiparous

Gestational weight gain

Mean

5% in primiparous 4% in multiparous

Combined

 

23% in primiparous 30% in multiparous

Gisselmann and Hemström (2008) [48]

Total effect OR: 1.41*

Job control

Not stated

44%

Job hazards

Not stated

5%

Physical demands

Not stated

22%

All working conditions

Not stated

46%

Niedhammer et al. (2012) [49]

Total effect HR: 2.14 (1.05–4.38)

Rented home

43% lower than secondary, 15% higher than secondary

26%

Crowded home

18% lower than secondary, 5% higher than secondary

13%

Material factors

Composite

33%

Smoking

46% lower than secondary, 16% higher than secondary

2%

Alcohol

50% lower than secondary, 62% higher than secondary

14%

Behavioural

Composite

10%

Saturated fatty acids (nutritional factors)

31% lower than secondary, 20% higher than secondary

14%

Material + behavioural

Composite Measure

38%

Material + behavioural + nutritional

Composite Measure

42%

Jansen et al. (2009) [50]

Total effect OR: 1.89 (1.28–2.80)

Mother’s age

Mean

22%

Mothers’ height

Mean

22%

Preeclampsia

2% total, 1% high, 4% low education

13%

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)

1% total, 1% high, 2% low education

12%

Marital status (single)

8% total, 3% high, 20% low education

2%

Pregnancy planning (unplanned)

19% total, 10% high, 34% low education

No effect

Financial concerns

12% total, 5% high, 30% low education

19%

Long-lasting difficulties

Mean

11%

Psychopathology

Mean

16%

Working hours

Mean

No effect

Smoking

18% total, 5% high, 45% low education

8%

Alcohol consumption

50% total, 68% high, 25% low education

17%

BMI

67% total healthy weight, 75% high, 51% low education

7%

All except preeclampsia/IUGR/ working hours/pregnancy planning

Composite Measure

69%

All except working hours/pregnancy planning

Composite Measure

89%

Quispel et al. (2014) [51]

Total effect OR: 1.06 (1.02–1.10)

Depression score

15%

No effect

Gissler et al. (2003) [52]

Total effect OR: 1.35 (1.25–1.45)

Smoking

15% total, 5% upper white collar, 26% blue collar workers

42%

Gray et al. (2008) [53]

Total effect OR: 1.49 (1.43–1.54)

Smoking

For 2 periods: 30% & 29% total, 15% for both periods in least deprived, 43% & 39% in most deprived

45%

de Oliveira et al. (2019) [54]

Direct standardised estimate: -0.083

Inadequate prenatal care

Not stated

Cannot be estimateda

Unwanted pregnancy

 

Cannot be estimateda

  1. * p value < 0.05, ** Percentage change in the odds per standard deviation increase
  2. a indirect effect significant, PTB preterm birth, HR hazard ratio, OR odds ratio, RR relative risk, RD risk difference, coefficient = beta coefficient, LPG liquefied petroleum gas, Mean mean score so prevalence score not calculable