Factors relevant to work participation from the perspective of adults with developmental dyslexia: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Table 1 Quality assessment of included studies ranked according to quality

Study	Rele-vance	Research question	Design	Context	Sam-pling	Data collection	Data analysis	Results	Reflexi-vity	Number of + / ±
Price et al., 2003 [21]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	±	8/1
Yeowell et al., 2018 [22]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	±	+	8/1
McNulty, 2003 [23]	+	+	+	-	+	+	+	+	+	8/0
Burns and Bell, 2011 [24]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	-	8/0
Gerber et al., 2004 [25]	+	+	+	+	±	+	+	+	-	7/1
Ferri et al., 2005 [26]	+	+	+	+	-	±	+	+	+	7/1
Burns et al., 2013 [27]	+	+	+	+	+	+	±	+	-	7/1
Hellendoorn and Ruijssenaars, 2000 [28]	+	+	+	-	+	+	+	+	-	7/0
Ferri et al., 2001 [29]	+	+	+	+	+	+	-	+	-	7/0
Sang et al., 2016 [30]	+	+	+	+	+	+	-	+	-	7/0
Major and Tetley, 2019^a [31]	+	+	+	±	±	+	±	+	+	6/3
Major and Tetley, 2019^b [32]	+	+	+	+	±	+	±	+	-	6/2
Raskind et al., 1997 [33]	+	+	+	-	-	+	±	+	+	6/1
Shessel and Reiff, 1999 [34]	+	+	+	+	±	+	-	+	-	6/1
Lindstrom and Benz, 2002 [35]	+	+	+	-	±	+	+	+	-	6/1
Macdonald, 2009 [36]	+	+	+	+	+	±	-	+	-	6/1
Newlands, 2015 [37]	+	+	+	+	±	+	-	+	-	6/1
Skinner and McGill, 2015 [38]	+	+	+	+	+	±	-	+	-	6/1
Locke et al., 2017 [39]	+	+	+	+	±	+	-	+	-	6/1

Studies were ranked by number of plusses: those with an equal number of plusses were sorted further by publication year and alphabetical order

ISSN: 1471-2458