Intervention Comparison | Study Number | Study | Study quality and Risk of Bias | Number of stair gates/Total number of households |
---|---|---|---|---|
Usual care (1) vs. Education (2) | 1 | Nansel (2002), RCT | A = U,B = Y,F = N | 70/89 76/85 |
2 | Kendrick (2005), RCT | A = Y,B = U,F = Y | 348.44/436.80a 310.93/376.78a | |
3 | Nansel (2008), Non-RCT | A = Y,B = U,F = N | 29/38 60/69 | |
Usual care (1) vs. Education + Low/free equipment (3) | 4 | Clamp (1998), RCT | A = Y,B = N,F = Y | 50/69 52/64 |
5 | McDonald (2005), RCT | A = U,B = N,F = N | 10/41 23/54 | |
Usual care (1) vs. Education + Low/free equipment + Home safety inspection (4) | 6 | Kendrick (1999), Non-RCT | A = U,B = Y,F = N | 214.26/323.61a 223.15/323.61a |
Usual care (1) vs. Education + Low/free equipment + Fitting (5) | 7 | Watson (2005), RCT | A = U,B = N,F = Y | 328/718 408/742 |
Usual care (1) vs. Education + Low/free equipment + Fitting + Home safety inspection (6) | 8 | Phelan (2010), RCT | B = N,F = N,C = Y | 78/147 131/146 |
Education (2) vs. Education + Low/free equipment (3) | 9 | Posner (2004), RCT | A = U,B = Y,F = Y | 25/47 28/49 |
Education (2) vs. Education + Low/free equipment + Fitting (5) | 10 | Sznajder (2003), RCT | A = N,B = N,F = Y | 45/50 44/47 |
Education + low/free equipment (3) vs. Education + low/free equipment + Home safety inspection (4) | 11 | Gielen (2002), RCT | A = Y,B = N,F = Y | 12.85/47.44a 10.87/47.44a |
Education + Low/free equipment + Home safety inspection (4) vs. Education + Home safety inspection (7) | 12 | King (2001), RCT | A = Y,B = Y,F = N | 158/482 166/469 |