Table 2 Concordance among peer leader selection methods. For each pair of peer leader sets, displayed are the number (and %) of students who appear in both sets
APL | POL | FNOL-Dg | FNOL-Co | FNOL-Cl | FNOL-Bt | KPL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APL | 459 (100%) | ||||||
POL | 99 (21.6%) | 459 (100%) | |||||
FNOL-Dg | 85 (18.5%) | 163 (35.5%) | 459 (100%) | ||||
FNOL-Co | 70 (15.3%) | 94 (20.5%) | 146 (31.8%) | 459 (100%) | |||
FNOL-Cl | 71 (15.5%) | 93 (20.3%) | 151 (32.9%) | 84 (18.3%) | 459 (100%) | ||
FNOL-Bt | 66 (14.4%) | 88 (19.2%) | 142 (30.9%) | 51 (11.1%) | 249 (54.2%) | 459 (100%) | |
KPL | 61 (13.3%) | 86 (18.7%) | 139 (30.3%) | 57 (12.4%) | 70 (15.3%) | 110 (24%) | 459 (100%) |
HPL-Inf | 104 (22.7%) | 258 (56.2%) | 227 (49.4%) | 88 (19.2%) | 128 (27.9%) | 142 (30.9%) | 127 (27.7%) |
HPL-Cen | 102 (22.2%) | 205 (44.7%) | 246 (53.6%) | 94 (20.4%) | 158 (34.4%) | 185 (40.3%) | 136 (29.6%) |
HPL-Str | 98 (21.3%) | 217 (47.2%) | 203 (44.2%) | 78 (17.0%) | 103 (22.4%) | 127 (27.7%) | 153 (33.3%) |