Skip to main content

Table 3 The association between household income in childhood and cardiometabolic risk in young adulthood evaluated by four life course models

From: Evaluating the association between socioeconomic position and cardiometabolic risk markers in young adulthood by different life course models

 

N

Adjusted cardiometabolic risk score (95% confidence interval)a

 

Household income

High

Average

Low

The latent effects model

 Early childhood

252

 

Base level

−0.1 (−0.4;0.3)

0.0 (− 0.3;0.3)

 Middle childhood

251

 

Base level

−0.2 (− 0.5;0.1)

−0.1 (− 0.4;0.3)

 Late childhood

249

 

Base level

0.1 (− 0.2;0.4)

− 0.1 (− 0.5;0.2)

The pathway model

 Prior to adjustment for lifestyle and adult SEP

249

 

Base level

0.0 (−0.3;0.3)

− 0.1 (− 0.5;0.3)

 After adjustment for lifestyle and adult SEP

224

 

Base level

0.0 (−0.3;0.3)

−0.3 (− 0.7;0.1)

The social mobility model

249

    

 Adult educational level: High

  

0.0 (−0.9;0.8)

−0.1 (− 0.9;0.7)

−0.1 (− 0.9;0.7)

 Adult educational level: Average

  

0.4 (−0.4;1.2)

0.4 (−0.4;1.2)

0.4 (− 0.4;1.2)

 Adult educational level: Low

  

0.8 (−0.2;1.7)

0.7 (−0.2;1.6)

0.7 (− 0.2;1.6)

Separate upward mobility coefficient

 

−0.5 (−1.2;0.1)

   

Separate downward mobility coefficient

 

−0.2 (− 0.9;0.5)

   

The cumulative model

248

    

 Regression coefficient

 

0.0 (0.0;0.1)

   

 0–2

 

Base level

   

 3–5

 

0.1 (−0.2;0.4)

   

 6–8

 

0.0 (− 0.4;0.4)

   
  1. SEP Socioeconomic position
  2. aAdjusted for sex, birth weight and parental cardiometabolic diseases