Skip to main content

Table 1 Evidence Table

From: Effect of interventions for non-emergent medical transportation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, Date, ID

Study Design

Sample Size

Enrolled Population

Intervention

Includes non-medical transportation?

Outcomes Measured

Results

Andersen, 2007 [19]

Observational, pre-post

Pre = 61

Post = 61

Urban HIV positive women

82% on Medicaid

91% African American

1–800 phone number to call for free, van ride to doctor’s office

No

Utilization (self-report number of visits, self-report number of missed opportunities)

No change in self-reported overall HIV clinic visits, but decreased self-report of missed appointments from 6 months prior to the intervention(mean 1.92 vs 0.72)

Bryan, 1991 [20]

Observational, pre-post with control

Intervention = 53

Control = 52

Patients who received cancer care and primary care at Wishard Hospital

Mean age = 63

7% African American

Both groups received a mailing describing resources to assist with transportation. The intervention group got in addition a telephone consultation to address possible solutions to transportation problems

No

Utilization (missed appointments as measured by electronic health record)

Missed clinic appointments Intervention pre = 23.7%; post = 23.6%; Control pre = 25.5%, post = 39.9%

Chaiyachati, 2018 [21]

Controlled clinical trial

786 (In 2 practices)

Intervention = 394

Control = 392

Medicaid adults

Mean age = 46

95% African American

Offered rideshare for free transport to clinic

No

Utilization (appointments kept as measured by electronic health record)

7 day or 30-day Emergency Department visits

Costs

Missed appointments intervention = 36.5%, control = 36.5%; 7 day ED visits intervention = 2%, control = 1%; mean cost = $14

Chaiyachati, 2018 [22]

Observational

Controlled before-and-after

506 (in 2 practices)

Intervention = 194

Control = 312

Medicaid adults

Mean age = 47

97% African American

Offered rideshare for free transport to clinic

No

Utilization (appointments kept as measured by electronic health record)

Appoints kept intervention pre = 54%, post = 68%; control pre = 60%, post = 51%

Ford, 2019 [23]

RCT

34

Intervention = 29

Control = 5

Participants in 4 primary care practices

Adults greater or equal to 64, not high utilizers and no car access

Mean age = 80

100% white

$2000 cash given to clinic to arrange transportation

No

Patient-perceived ease of appointment, cost

Equivalent annual cost per older, socio-disadvantaged older patient without access to a car was lowest in practice with call-stacking system aimed to develop closer links with a community transport provider

Kim, 2009 [24]

Observational

Controlled before-and-after

 > 50,000

Children with asthma, adults under 65 with DM

Medicaid

No details of population reported

Transportation brokerage services (profit or non-profit organizations who manage nonemergency medical transportation on a capitated basis)

No

Health, cost, use of transportation services

Statistically significant decreases in monthly NEMT expenditures per person, $18 decrease in mean monthly expenditure per person for both patient groups; decrease in ambulatory care sensitive conditions in diabetics

Marcus, 1992 [25]

RCT

2044

Women with abnormal cervical cytology

79% < age 45

28% African American

41% Hispanic

Bus tickets mailed to women with note that follow-up was needed for cervical cytology result

No

Loss to follow-up

Transportation incentives had significant positive impact on return rates (adjusted odds ratio = 1.48, (95% CI 1.06, 2.06))

Melnikow, 1997 [26]

RCT

Enrolled = 104 (in 5 clinics)

Follow-up = 86

Taxi voucher = 34

Blanket coupon = 35

Control = 35

Pregnant women in need of pre-natal care

Mean age = 25

53% white

Taxicab voucher for travel to pre-natal appointment

No

Utilization (appointment kept)

Unadjusted odds ratio for keeping first appointment = 0.32 (95% CI 0.12, 0.88)

Saxon, 2019 [27]

Observational, pre-post

Pre = 150

Post = 103

Urban academic health center patients; 60 years of age or older, English-speaking, had a chronic disease, had self-reported transportation barriers

Mean age = 72

54% white

3 months of free unlimited ride-share transportation (not just for medical needs)

Yes

Health status (HRQoL; daily step count)

No significant differences between pre-and post-study daily step counts or validated measures of Satisfaction with Life and Geriatric Depression

Vais, 2020a [28]

Observational, pre-post

78

Ride utilizers = 19

Denied transportation issues = 30

Rescheduled < 72 h = 12

Could not be reached by telephone = 17

Gynecology patients who reported difficulties with transportation (excluding obstetrics)

Mean age = 36–42

100% African American

Free roundtrip transportation to clinic visit using ride-share

No

Utilization (clinic no-show rate), costs

Weekly no-show rate pre = 27.8%, post = 19.4%; average cost of rides was $32.48

Vais, 2020b [29]

Observational pre-post

86

Ride utilizers = 32

Denied transportation issues = 31

Could not be reached = 23

Patients with sickle cell disease and their caregivers attending a public urban pediatric specialty clinic

Mean age = 13

73% African American

Free roundtrip transportation to clinic visit using ride-share

No

Utilization (clinic no-show rate), costs

Decrease in no-show rate from 20.4% to 11.9% using transportation service; total cost of rideshares = $2175; average round trip cost was $67

Whorms, 2021 [30]

Observational, Pre-post

Pre-intervention = 8021

Ride share = 151

Post-intervention non-ride share = 7556

Patients scheduled for MRI at an urban academic health center

Mean age 54–60

76% white

Free ride share for patients who spontaneously expressed transportation difficulty in pre-visit reminder telephone call

No

Same day cancellations, timeliness for appointment, cost of rides

No statistically significant difference in same day clinic cancellations (8.1% vs 8.0%); 8 min earlier check-in time for ride share appointment patients, average cost of ride = $17.92