Skip to main content

Table 6 Energy intake

From: Household-specific physical activity levels and energy intakes according to the presence of metabolic syndrome in Korean young adults: Korean National Health and nutrition examination survey 2016–2018

Factors

Group

Total

Household type

ANOVA

Multiple

Single

F-value

p -Value (η2)

Power

Total energy intake (kcal)

Non-MetS

MetS

p-value

2149.0 ± 19.4

2396.7 ± 58.9

<  0.001***

2137.8 ± 21.1

2443.6 ± 67.9†††

2250.1 ± 56.5

2012.1 ± 130.6†‡

H

M

H × M

102.233***

0.200

28.101***

0.000(0.011)

0.654(0.000)

0.000(0.003)

1.000

0.073

1.000

Carbohydrate intake (kcal)

Non-MetS

MetS

p-value

1173.0 ± 11.2

1236.5 ± 24.4

0.021*

1170.8 ± 12.2

1244.0 ± 26.2††

1193.3 ± 26.9

1174.9 ± 85.8

H

M

H × M

0.237

0.252

7.335**

0.789(0.000)

0.616(0.000)

0.001(0.001)

0.087

0.079

0.939

Protein intake

(kcal)

Non-MetS

MetS

p-value

324.5 ± 3.8

362.4 ± 9.8

< 0.001***

323.4 ± 4.2

367.1 ± 11.2†††

334.4 ± 9.2

323.5 ± 23.3

H

M

H × M

160.606***

0.886

25.2218***

0.000(0.018)

0.347(0.000)

0.000(0.003)

1.000

0.156

1.000

Fat intake

(kcal)

Non-MetS

MetS

p-value

523.9 ± 8.8

567.1 ± 23.1

0.090

517.4 ± 9.2

580.9 ± 26.6†††

581.9 ± 25.2

453.9 ± 41.2††‡

H

M

H × M

278.513***

7.183**

30.312***

0.000(0.030)

0.007(0.000)

0.000(0.003)

1.000

0.764

1.000

  1. Values are expressed as means standard errors
  2. Main effect = H (Household) and M (Metabolic syndrome), Interaction effect = H × M (Household × Metabolic syndrome)
  3. Two-way analysis of variance following Bonferroni post-hoc test
  4. MetS metabolic syndrome
  5. *p < 0.05
  6. **p < 0.01
  7. ***p < 0.001
  8. p < 0.05
  9. ††p < 0.01
  10. †††p < 0.001 compared with Non-MetS values
  11. p < 0.01 compared with Multiple values