Skip to main content

Table 4 Effectiveness of intervention groups on the total bacterial load and the loads by bacterial species of dibiterie meat in Dakar

From: Effectiveness and cost of an incentive-based intervention on food safety and income in “dibiteries” in Dakar, Senegal

Groups

Bacterial species

Phase 2

Phase 3

Coefficient

mean estimate

95%CI

p-value

Coefficient

mean estimate

95%CI

p-value

Group (b)

TAMF

−1.34

0.26

[−3.05; 0.35]

0.130

−3.44

0.03

[−6.36; −0.54]

0.027**

TC

−1.82

0.16

[−5.07; 1.41]

0.276

−3.31

0.04

[−6.34; − 0.29]

0.039**

SA

−2.00

0.13

[−3.73; − 0.28]

0.029**

0.60e-17

1.00

[−0.96; 0.96]

1.000

Samples (all bacterial species)

−1.36

2.55

[−3.06; 0.32]

0.122

−3.44

0.03

[−6.33; −0.57]

0.025**

Group (c)

TAMF

1.06

2.89

[−0.64; 2.76]

0.230

−0.37

0.69

[−3.28; 2.54]

0.803

TC

−0.03

0.97

[−3.27; 3.21]

0.986

−0.69

0.50

[−3.72; 2.34]

0.658

SA

−0.33

0.71

[−2.07; 1.39]

0.704

0.67

1.97

[−0.28; 1.63]

0.174

Samples (all bacterial species)

1.03

2.80

[−0.66; 2.72]

0.240

−0.37

0.68

[−3.26; 2.49]

0.798

Group (d)

TAMF

−0.56

0.57

[−2.27; 1.13]

0.517

−1.70

0.18

[−4.69; 1.29]

0.275

TC

−0.06

0.93

[−3.31; 3.17]

0.968

−3.09

0.05

[−6.22; 0.03]

0.061

SA

−1.64

0.19

[−3.37; 0.08]

0.071

0.26e-17

1.00

[−0.99; 0.99]

1.000

Samples (all bacterial species)

−0.58

0.56

[−2.28; 1.10]

0.501

−1.73

0.18

[−4.70; 1.23]

0.259

  1. ** significant at p < 0.05; CI confidence interval