Skip to main content

Table 4 Effectiveness of intervention groups on the total bacterial load and the loads by bacterial species of dibiterie meat in Dakar

From: Effectiveness and cost of an incentive-based intervention on food safety and income in “dibiteries” in Dakar, Senegal

Groups Bacterial species Phase 2 Phase 3
Coefficient mean estimate 95%CI p-value Coefficient mean estimate 95%CI p-value
Group (b) TAMF −1.34 0.26 [−3.05; 0.35] 0.130 −3.44 0.03 [−6.36; −0.54] 0.027**
TC −1.82 0.16 [−5.07; 1.41] 0.276 −3.31 0.04 [−6.34; − 0.29] 0.039**
SA −2.00 0.13 [−3.73; − 0.28] 0.029** 0.60e-17 1.00 [−0.96; 0.96] 1.000
Samples (all bacterial species) −1.36 2.55 [−3.06; 0.32] 0.122 −3.44 0.03 [−6.33; −0.57] 0.025**
Group (c) TAMF 1.06 2.89 [−0.64; 2.76] 0.230 −0.37 0.69 [−3.28; 2.54] 0.803
TC −0.03 0.97 [−3.27; 3.21] 0.986 −0.69 0.50 [−3.72; 2.34] 0.658
SA −0.33 0.71 [−2.07; 1.39] 0.704 0.67 1.97 [−0.28; 1.63] 0.174
Samples (all bacterial species) 1.03 2.80 [−0.66; 2.72] 0.240 −0.37 0.68 [−3.26; 2.49] 0.798
Group (d) TAMF −0.56 0.57 [−2.27; 1.13] 0.517 −1.70 0.18 [−4.69; 1.29] 0.275
TC −0.06 0.93 [−3.31; 3.17] 0.968 −3.09 0.05 [−6.22; 0.03] 0.061
SA −1.64 0.19 [−3.37; 0.08] 0.071 0.26e-17 1.00 [−0.99; 0.99] 1.000
Samples (all bacterial species) −0.58 0.56 [−2.28; 1.10] 0.501 −1.73 0.18 [−4.70; 1.23] 0.259
  1. ** significant at p < 0.05; CI confidence interval