Skip to main content

Table 7 Personal characteristics associated with past and future adherence to COVID-19 measures

From: COVID-19 measures in Belgium: how perception and adherence of the general population differ between time periods

Characteristica

Past adherenceb

Intended adherenceb

B-value (CI)

p-value

B-value (CI)

p-value

Intercept

3.9 (3.8;4.1)

< .001

3.6 (3.5;3.8)

< .001

Language

 French

−0.2 (−0.2;−0.1)

< .001

  

 Dutch

Ref

Ref

  

Region

   

< .001

 Flanders

  

0.2 (0.1;0.2)

< .001

 Brussels

  

0.1 (0.0;0.2)

.003

 Wallonia

  

Ref

Ref

Gender

    

 Male

−0.1 (−0.1;−0.1)

< .001

-0.1 (− 0.1;0.0)

.008

 Female

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Age

 

< .001

 

< .001

 18–30 years

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 31–45 years

0.2 (0.1;0.3)

< .001

0.2 (0.1;0.3)

< .001

 46–60 years

0.3 (0.3;0.4)

< .001

0.3 (0.3;0.4)

< .001

 61–75 years

0.5 (0.3;0.6)

< .001

0.4 (0.3;0.6)

< .001

 76 years and over

0.5 (0.3;0.6)

< .001

0.5 (0.3;0.6)

< .001

Occupation

 

.017

 

.014

 No, incapacitated to work

0.2 (0.1;0.2)

.001

0.2 (0.1;0.3)

.001

 No, prepension

0.0 (−0.2;0.1)

.629

-0.1 (−0.3;0.1)

.336

 No, pension

0.0 (−0.1;0.1)

.680

0.1 (−0.1;0.2)

.397

 No, unemployed

0.0 (−0.1;0.1)

.726

0.0 (−0.1;0.2)

.692

 No, student

0.0 (−0.1;0.1)

.372

0.0 (−0.1;0.1)

.522

 No, homemaker

0.1 (0.0;0.2)

.184

0.1 (−0.1;0.2)

.276

 No, never or not yet worked

−0.2 (− 0.5;0.1)

.113

− 0.3 (− 0.6;0.1)

.117

 Yes

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Confirmed infection with symptoms

 No

0.2 (0.1;0.3)

.001

0.2 (0.1;0.4)

< .001

 Yes

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Survey

 September 2020

0.1 (0.1;0.2)

< .001

0.1 (0.1;0.2)

< .001

 April/May 2021

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  1. Past adherence model: R2 = .076; adjusted R2 = .075
  2. Future adherence model: R2 = .066; adjusted R2 = .062
  3. aOther characteristics that were also included as potential predictors, but did not have a significant association in either model, were annual income, score for health today, household composition and educational level.
  4. bThe sample size of both multivariate analyses was 3989.