Table 1 Final Individual Sources of Evidence Included in the Scoping Review
Author, Year | Country | Age of Children | Study Size | Other Population Characteristics | Family Characteristics | Family Socioeconomic Position | Health Outcome | Data Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kim & Gallien 2016 [43] | United States | 0–6 months | 13,138 | no information reported | structure (single-/two-parent: dichotomous) | household income: low/high | being breastfed: dichotomous | moderating effects logistic regression SEP-stratified outcome measures |
Pearce et al. 2012 [44] | United Kingdom | 9 months –3 years | 14,378 | excluded: unemployed mothers | living (safety equipment use: score) | maternal education: 7 categories | unintentional injury: dichotomous | mediating effects logistic regression mediating effects Poisson regression |
Browne & Jenkins 2012 [45] | Canada | 20 months –6 years | 501 | oversampled: immigrant background | process (differential negativity in family: score) | maternal education: number of years | parent-rated health: 5-point Likert scale | moderating effects logistic regression interaction terms SEP*family processes graphical analysis/chart |
Puff & Renk 2014 [50] | United States | 2–6 years | 119 | no information reported | process (parent–child stress: score) | SEP index (financial cutbacks): score SEP index (negative economic events): score | behavioural difficulties: score | mediating effects linear regression |
Määttä et al. 2017 [46] | Finland | 3–6 years | 864 | no information reported | process (rules / norms limiting screentime in hours, minutes: continuous) processes (parental screentime hours per day: metric) | parental education: low/middle/high | screentime: calculated daily average | mediating effects linear regression |
Wijtzes et al. 2012 [47] | The Netherlands | 4 years | 2,786 | excluded: non Dutch mothers | process (parental screentime: scale) living (TV in bedroom: dichotomous) | maternal education: 4 categories | screentime: dichotomous | mediating effects logistic regression |
Strazdins et al. 2010 [48] | Australia | 4–5 years | 3,580 | no information reported | size (infant in family: dichotomous) structure (single-/cohabiting: dichotomous) | household income: low/mid-to-high | behavioural difficulties: score | moderating effects linear regression, chart SEP-stratified outcome measures |
Hagan et al. 2016 [51] | United States | 4–6 years | 338 | no information reported | processes (negativity in parent–child relationship: score) | SEP index (education, income): low/high | parent-rated impairment: score parent-rated chronic medical conditions: score | mediating effects reported moderating effects linear regression interaction terms SEP*family process graphical analysis/chart |
Li et al. 2017 [49] | United States | 5–6 years | 140 | included: uncomplicated, singleton pregnancies | size (children in household: number) size/living combined (household instability: score) process (major life events: scale) | family income: 10 categories | development in cognitive self-regulation: score | mediating effects linear regression moderating effects linear regression interaction terms family size*SEP |
Demir et al. 2015 [52] | United States | 5–6 years | 68 | included: children with brain injury, English-speaker | process (parent–child talk: metric) | SEP index (income, education): Metric | development in language: score | mediating effects linear regression |