Skip to main content

Table 5 Structural Equation Model of the Relationships Between Individual and Family Health. N = 482

From: Validation of the family health scale among heterosexual couples: a dyadic analysis

 

Family Health

Women’s EF Deficits

Men’s EF Deficits

Women’s Depression

Men’s Depression

Women’s General Health

Men’s General Health

Adjusted Correlations

 Women’s EF Deficits

−.57***

     

 Men’s EF Deficits

−.44***

.53***

    

 Women’s Depression

−.55***

.69***

.49***

   

 Men’s Depression

−.40***

.53***

.49***

.61***

  

 Women’s Health

.32***

−.40***

−.27***

−.33***

−.27***

 

 Men’s Health

.33***

−.31***

−.40***

−.21***

−.43***

.26***

Structural Equation Model Controls

 Women’s Age

−.00

−.06

.01

.09

.05

−.12**

−.12**

 Household Income

.23***

−.04

−.04

−.16*

−.10

.19**

.15*

 Women’s Race (White)

−.05

.04

−.06

−.18**

 Men’s Race (White)

.00

−.05

−.02

−.08

 Interracial Marriage

−.02

−.02

−.04

−.03

−.00

−.01

−.00

 Women’s Education

−.03

−.22*

.02

−.04

 Men’s Education

.04

.07

.21

−.11

 Women’s ACEs

−.06

.32***

.42***

−.25***

 Men’s ACEs

−.22***

.28

.43***

−.29***

 Women’s PCEs

.19***

−.09

−.06

.12**

 Men’s PCEs

.22***

−.11

−.13

.11*

 Women’s Childhood Poverty

−.10

.02

.04

.00

 Men’s Childhood Poverty

−.02

.04

.09

−0.07

  1. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001. Model Fit: RMSEA: 0.039; CFI: 0.947. Notes: EF = executive functioning deficits; EF was measured using the LEAF scale; depression was measured using the PHQ-9; men’s and women’s health was measured using the RAND Health Survey; and family health was measured using the FHS-SF