Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate Correlations and Descriptive Statistics of parental rearing and IS (n = 3345)

From: Quantile regression analysis of the association between parental rearing and interpersonal sensitivity in Chinese adolescents

Variables

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1.F1

1

         

2.F2

−0.11c

1

        

3.F3

0.17c

0.54c

1

       

4.F5

−0.08c

0.68c

0.56c

1

      

5.F6

0.24c

0.43c

0.58c

0.49c

1

     

6.M1

0.75c

−0.15c

0.05

−0.14c

0.10c

1

    

7.M2

0.03

0.38c

0.58c

0.42c

0.52c

0.13c

1

   

8.M3

-0.22c

0.50c

0.37c

0.61c

0.35c

-0.20c

0.60c

1

  

9.M4

-0.16c

0.60c

0.31c

0.44c

0.26c

-0.13c

0.53c

0.69c

1

 

10.IS

-0.16c

0.26c

0.22c

0.31c

0.24c

-0.10c

0.32c

0.37c

0.27c

1

Mean

45.95

15.40

18.77

8.47

10.17

50.24

33.48

12.32

12.16

1.99

SD

11.06

5.00

4.60

2.76

2.98

11.21

7.77

4.12

3.82

0.73

  1. Note. Father rearing, emotional warmth = F1; punishment = F2; overinvolvement = F3; rejection = F5; overprotection = F6. Mother rearing, emotional warmth = M1; overinvolvement and overprotection = M2; rejection = M3; punishment = M4. IS = interpersonal sensitivity. SD = standard deviation
  2. c P value < 0.00111 was regarded as significant after Bonferroni corrected
  3. The correlation (r) between parental rearing and IS was measured using Pearson correlation, while significance was also checked using t-tests