Who gets vaccinated in a measles-rubella campaign in Nepal?: results from a post-campaign coverage survey

Danovaro-Holliday, M. Carolina; Rhoda, Dale A.; Lacoul, Mona; Prier, Mary L.; Gautam, Jhalak Sharma; Pokhrel, Tara Nath; Dixit, Sameer Mani; Rajbhandari, Rajesh Man; Bose, Anindya Sekhar

doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12475-0

BMC Public Health

Table 4 Logistic regression model performance of exploratory univariable models and the multivariable main effects model

From: Who gets vaccinated in a measles-rubella campaign in Nepal?: results from a post-campaign coverage survey

Index	Variable name and categories	Got Campaign Dose % (weighted)	N (unweighted)	Unadjusted Odds Ratio	p-value (Same as univariable logistic regression p-value)	Logistic regression c-stat (or area under the ROC curve)	Weighted % predicted vx’d (0.5 cut off)	Weighted % vx’d correct prediction (i.e., given they got campaign dose, what % had phat > 0.5?)	Weighted % not vx’d correctly predicted (i.e., given they didn’t get campaign dose, what % had phat < 0.5?)
1^a	Knew about Campaign				< 0.0001	0.90	87.5	99.7	80.1
	Yes	96.5	4223	1477.21
	No	1.8	647	Ref
2^a	Urban/Rural				0.0087	0.53	100	100	0
	Rural	85.6	2640	Ref
	Urban	79.0	2230	0.63
3	Earthquake Area				0.3524	0.52	100	100	0
	Yes	82.6	1100	Ref
	No	85.2	3770	1.21
4	Gender				0.8098	0.50	100	100	0
	Boy	84.5	2565	Ref
	Girl	84.9	2305	1.03
5^a	Caregiver Marital Status				0.2009	0.50	100	100	0
	Married	84.6	4746	Ref
	Not Married	97.5	33	7.12
	Unknown	85.4	91	1.07
6^a	Caregiver Education				0.0717	0.55	100	100	0
	Don’t Know or less than Primary	81.2	1423	Ref
	Primary	88.3	888	1.74
	More than Primary	85.6	2559	1.37
7^a	Caregiver Religion				0.1012	0.53	100	100	0
	Hindu	84.6	4195	Ref
	Buddhist	91.3	320	1.91
	Muslim	76.2	239	0.58
	Not Hindu/Buddhist/ Muslim	83.5	116	0.92
8^a	Ethnic Group				< 0.0001	0.65	100	100	0
	Hill Brahmin	87.9	579	Ref
	Hill Chhetri	90.7	1100	1.35
	Terai Brahmin Chettri	91.8	175	1.54
	Other Terai Caste	64.9	451	0.25
	Hill Dalit	88.0	360	1.01
	Terai Dalit	79.4	236	0.53
	Newar	84.8	295	0.77
	Hill Janajati	85.8	899	0.84
	Terai Janajati	91.4	408	1.46
	Muslim	76.0	236	0.44
	Others	88.5	131	1.06
9^a	Source of Income				< 0.0001	0.61	100	100	0
	Professional/Technical/Managerial	79.5	101	Ref
	Jobber/Service holder	85.1	892	1.47
	Sales and services	85.5	914	1.53
	Skilled manual	74.8	787	0.77
	Unskilled manual	80.5	306	1.07
	Agriculture	89.1	1651	2.12
	Others	79.8	219	1.02
10	Migration				0.4184	0.51	100	100	0
	Yes	82.8	889	Ref
	No	84.9	3981	1.17
11	Migration Time				0.4706	0.51	100	100	0
	Didn’t migrate	84.9	3981	Ref
	Migrated < 12 months ago	75.2	49	0.54
	Migrated 1–5 years ago	83.2	840	0.88
12^a	Someone in the Family Works Abroad				0.1444	0.53	100	100	0
	Yes	87.4	1322	Ref
	No	83.5	3548	0.73
13^a	# Family Members in HH				0.1630	0.53	100	100	0
	< =4 members in HH	86.5	2190	Ref
	> 4 members in HH	83.5	2680	0.79
14^a	# Children 9–59 months in HH				0.2207	0.52	100	100	0
	< =1 child in HH aged 9–59 month	85.4	3503	Ref
	> 1 child in HH aged 9–59 month	83.2	1367	0.85
15^a	Child Age Group				0.2961	0.51	100	100	0
	Child <=36mo	85.3	2343	Ref
	Child >36mo	84.1	2527	0.91
16^a	Province				< 0.0001	0.69	100	100	0
	Province 1	87.9	806	Ref
	Province 2	70.0	730	0.32
	Province 3	81.1	1163	0.59
	Province 4	87.4	495	0.96
	Province 5	91.4	616	1.46
	Province 6	98.0	740	6.76
	Province 7	96.0	320	3.31
17^a	Ecological Belt				0.0002	0.60	100	100	0
	Mountain	96.1	885	Ref
	Hill	88.3	1923	0.31
	Terai (Plain)	80	2062	0.16
	Multivariable Main Effects Model	84.7	4870			0.96	86.8	99.6	80.8

Sections 1–17 of this table describe results from univariable models; only the final row of the table describes performance of the multivariable model
^aDenotes a variable that was retained in the main effects model

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcpublichealth@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com