Skip to main content

Table 4 Change of lipid profiles from baseline at end-line (after 12-weeks intervention) by intervention group

From: Effectiveness of optimized food-based recommendation promotion to improve nutritional status and lipid profiles among Minangkabau women with dyslipidemia: A cluster-randomized trial

Lipid profile parameters

FBR Group (Intervention, n=48)

Non FBR (Comparison, n=54)

Mean difference† (FBR - Non-FBR) ((lower; upper bound of 95% CI), p value*

Baseline

(SE)

End of trial

(SE)

Change from baseline

(Lower; upper bound of 95% CI), p-value*

Baseline

(SE)

End of trial

(SE)

Change from baseline

(Lower; upper bound of 95% CI), p-value*

Total cholesterol, mg/dL

221 (4.1)

230 (3.9)

12.5(7.0; 14.8), 0.006

207(4.9)

222(4.6)

15.5(10.5;20.6), 0.045

-2.9(-9.7; 3.86), 0.391

LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL

149 (3.9)

155 (3.5)

9.8(4.7;14.8), 0.033

135(4.3)

150(4.2)

14.6(4.7;14.8), 0.064

-4.8(-11.1;1.4), 0.129

HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL

44.2 (1.6)

49.3(2.1)

5.0(3.2;6.9), <0.001

46(1.2)

50(1.7)

4(1.9; 6.1), <0.001

0.4(-2.7;3.7), 0.767

Triglyceride, mean (SE), mg/dL)

139 (12.8)

122(11.5)

-16.9(-35.4; 1.9), 0.077

126(8.6)

111(7.8)

-15.7(-26.3; -5.1);0.005

-2.4(--26.8;21.9), 0.843

Catelli’s Index I(TC/HDL)

5.0 (0.118)

4.8(0.155)

-0.22(-0.4; -0.05), 0.011

4.57(0.13)

4.47(0.18)

-0.1(-0.35;0.14); 0.397

-0.19(-0.544; 0.167), 0.294

Catelli’s Index II(LDL/HDL)

3.4 (0.10)

3.3(0.13)

-0.11(-0.28;0.04), 0.147

2.9(0.11)

2.9(0.16)

0.001(-0.24; 0.24), 0.991

-0.10(-0.56; 0.11), 0.178

Castelli’s index I > 4.5, n (%)

33 (68.7)

24(50.0)

-9(-18.7)

28(51.9)

20(37.0)

-8(-14.8)

n.a

Decrease in Castelli’s Index, n (%)

n.a

34(70.8)

n.a

n.a

36(66.7)

n.a

n.a

  1. FBR = Food Base Recommendations; LDL = Low density Lipoprotein; HDL = High Density Lipoprotein; n.a = not available
  2. Adjusted for stratification variables at randomization (cluster) using Mixed Model Analysis
  3. †Adjusted for age, hormonal contraception use, and stratification variables at randomization (subjects nested within the cluster) using Mixed Model Analysis
  4. *Significant difference at p<0.05