Skip to main content

Table 3 Change of nutritional status from baseline at end-line (after 12-weeks intervention) by intervention group

From: Effectiveness of optimized food-based recommendation promotion to improve nutritional status and lipid profiles among Minangkabau women with dyslipidemia: A cluster-randomized trial

Nutritional status Parameter/Indices

FBR Group (Intervention, n=48)

Non FBR (Comparison, n=54)

Mean difference† (FBR - Non-FBR) ((lower; upper bound of 95% CI), p-value*

Baseline

(SE)

End of trial

(SE)

Change from baseline

(Lower; upper bound of 95% CI), p-value*

Baseline

(SE)

End of trial

(SE)

Change from baseline

(Lower; upper bound of 95% CI), p-value*

Body weight, kg

67.6(1.69)

65.69(1.63)

-1.9(-2.5; -1.4), <0.001

64.9(1.82)

64.0(1.78)

-0.89(-1.3; -0.5), <0.001

-1.1(-1.86 ;-0.39;), 0.003

Body Mass Index, kg/m2

28.8(0.64)

27.9(0.62)

-0.8(-1.03; -0.57), <0.001

28.2(0.62)

27.8(0.62)

-0.39(-0.57; -0.24), <0.001

-0.43(-0.76; -0.11), 0.008

Waist circumference, cm

90.9(1.32)

87.2(1.34)

-3.7(-4.7; -2.7), <0.001

89.8(1.33)

87.9(1.33)

-1.9(-3.0; -0.97), <0.001

-2.1(-3.7; -0.46), 0.013

Overweight and obesity, n (%)

39(81.3)

34 (70.9)

-5(-10.4), 0.046

40(75.3)

39(72.3)

-1(-1.8). 0.3117

n.a

Abdominal obesity, n (%)

41(85.4)

37 (77.1)

-4(-8.3), 0.157

41(75.9)

41(75.9)

0(0.0), 1.00

n.a

  1. FBR = Food Base Recommendations; SE = standard error; n.a = not available
  2. Adjusted for age, contraception use, and stratification variables at randomization (subject nested within the cluster) using Mixed Model Analysis
  3. †Adjusted for age, contraception use, and stratification variables at randomization (subject nested within the cluster) using Mixed Model Analysis
  4. *Significant difference at p<0.05