Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons of incidence and prevalence trend stability across juvenile diabetes algorithmsa,b

From: Control charts for chronic disease surveillance: testing algorithm sensitivity to changes in data coding

Algorithm

All years (1975-2016)

ICDA-8 Period (1975-1979)

ICD-9 Period (1980-2004)

ICD-9/10 Period (2005-2016)

ICD-8 to − 9 Implementation Period (1977-1981)

ICD-9 to − 9/10 Implementation Period (2002-2006)

OOC Count

OOC Propc

McNemar’s Test

McNemar’s Test

McNemar’s Test

McNemar’s Test

McNemar’s Test

McNemar’s Test

p-value

adj. p-value

p-value

adj. p-value

p-value

adj. p-value

p-value

adj. p-value

p-value

adj. p-value

p-value

adj. p-value

Incidence

 1: 1 + H or 1 + P

30

0.71

0.48

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.34

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 1: 1 + H or 2 + P

29

0.69

0.63

1.00

0.50

1.00

0.15

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

 1: 1 + H or 3 + P

28

0.67

0.83

1.00

0.25

1.00

0.10

1.00

0.68

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 1: 1 + H or 4 + P

26

0.62

1.00

1.00

0.63

1.00

0.42

1.00

0.68

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

 2: 1 + H or 1 + P

26

0.62

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

 2: 1 + H or 2 + P

29

0.69

0.61

1.00

0.50

1.00

0.02

0.33

0.68

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

 3: 1 + H or 1 + P

29

0.69

0.58

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.68

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 3: 1 + H or 2 + P

27

0.64

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.29

1.00

0.68

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 1: 1 + P

29

0.69

0.65

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.34

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 1: 2 + P

29

0.69

0.63

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.13

1.00

0.50

1.00

 2: 1 + P

27

0.64

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

NA

NA

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 2: 2 + P

28

0.67

0.80

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.34

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

 2: 3 + P

24

0.57

0.81

1.00

0.13

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.68

1.00

0.13

1.00

0.50

1.00

 2: 4 + P

27

0.64

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.55

1.00

0.68

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

 2: 5 + P

32

0.76

0.21

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.11

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

Prevalence

 1: 1 + H or 1 + P

30

0.71

0.80

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.62

1.00

0.13

1.00

1.00

1.00

 1: 1 + H or 2 + P

30

0.71

0.80

1.00

0.63

1.00

0.29

1.00

0.13

1.00

0.25

1.00

0.50

1.00

 1: 1 + H or 3 + P

34

0.81

0.79

1.00

0.13

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.63

1.00

 1: 1 + H or 4 + P

29

0.69

0.63

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.58

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.13

1.00

1.00

1.00

 2: 1 + H or 1 + P

32

0.76

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

 2: 1 + H or 2 + P

25

0.60

0.17

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.72

1.00

0.18

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 3: 1 + H or 1 + P

33

0.79

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.07

1.00

0.13

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

 3: 1 + H or 2 + P

22

0.52

0.06

0.77

1.00

1.00

0.39

1.00

0.08

1.00

0.13

1.00

1.00

1.00

 1: 1 + P

30

0.71

0.81

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.45

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.63

1.00

 1: 2 + P

29

0.69

0.65

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.77

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.13

1.00

1.00

1.00

 1: 3 + P

35

0.83

0.61

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.75

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.25

1.00

0.63

1.00

 1: 4 + P

31

0.74

1.00

1.00

0.13

1.00

0.58

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

 2: 1 + P

31

0.74

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

NA

NA

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 2: 2 + P

24

0.57

0.14

1.00

0.25

1.00

0.77

1.00

0.45

1.00

0.25

1.00

1.00

1.00

 2: 3 + P

19

0.45

0.02

0.26

0.13

1.00

0.39

1.00

0.18

1.00

0.50

1.00

1.00

1.00

 2: 4 + P

21

0.50

0.03

0.44

0.50

1.00

0.27

1.00

0.22

1.00

0.50

1.00

1.00

1.00

 2: 5 + P

26

0.62

0.24

1.00

0.50

1.00

0.58

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.25

1.00

0.50

1.00

  1. p-values <.05 are bolded
  2. OOC Out-of-control, Prop Proportion, Adj. p-value Adjusted p-value. Adjusted using the Holm-Bonferroni Adjustment Methods
  3. aIf number of observations < 10, McNemar’s exact test was used. Otherwise McNemar’s approximate test was used
  4. bValue of NA indicates results were the same as the comparison group
  5. cOOC count over forty-two