Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of outpatient care utilization

From: The effects of smoking, regular drinking, and unhealthy weight on health care utilization in China

 

Pooled logistic

Random effects logistic

Fixed effects logistic

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

Odds Ratios (95% CI)

Odds Ratios (95% CI)

Odds Ratios (95% CI)

Smoking status

 Current smoker

1.12 (1.03–1.21)

1.16 (1.06–1.27)

1.88 (1.42–2.51)

 Former smoker

1.12 (1.01–1.24)

1.20 (1.07–1.33)

2.03 (1.51–2.74)

 Never smoker (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Regular drinking

0.82 (0.76–0.88)

0.80 (0.74–0.87)

0.83 (0.75–0.93)

BMI groups

 Healthy weight (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Underweight

1.11 (1.02–1.21)

1.13 (1.03–1.25)

1.09 (0.96–1.24)

 Overweight

0.96 (0.91–1.01)

0.96 (0.91–1.02)

1.02 (0.93–1.10)

 Obese

0.99 (0.91–1.08)

1.03 (0.94–1.13)

1.26 (1.08–1.46)

Age group

 16–24 (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 25–64

1.55 (1.32–1.83)

1.58 (1.32–1.89)

1.17 (0.91–1.50)

  > =65

1.98 (1.67–2.35)

2.20(1.83–2.66)

1.69 (1.28–2.23)

Male

0.71 (0.66–0.77)

0.65 (0.60–0.71)

–

Educational attainment

 Illiteracy (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Elementary school

0.88 (0.82–0.94)

0.85 (0.79–0.92)

0.98 (0.82–1.17)

 Middle school

0.85 (0.80–0.91)

0.82 (0.76–0.88)

1.04 (0.81–1.33)

 High school

0.79 (0.72–0.87)

0.75 (0.68–0.82)

1.16 (0.81–1.65)

 Above high school

0.76 (0.68–0.86)

0.70 (0.62–0.80)

1.20 (0.77–1.87)

Married

0.96 (0.89–1.04)

0.95 (0.86–1.04)

0.82 (0.69–0.98)

Urban residency

0.90 (0.86–0.95)

0.91 (0.86–0.97)

1.26 (1.09–1.45)

Medical insurance coverage

1.18 (1.09–1.28)

1.19 (1.09–1.30)

1.12 (1.01–1.23)

Household income

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

1.00 (1.00–1.01)

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

Employed

1.14 (1.08–1.21)

1.18 (1.11–1.25)

1.23 (1.13–1.33)

Health status

 Poor

3.07 (2.89–3.26)

3.44 (3.21–3.68)

2.49 (2.30–2.69)

 Fair (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Good

0.46 (0.43–0.48)

0.44 (0.42–0.47)

0.57 (0.53–0.61)

 Chronic disease

3.09 (2.93–3.26)

3.23 (3.06–3.42)

2.21 (2.07–2.35)

 Constant

0.18 (0.15–0.22)

0.15 (0.12–0.18)

–

 Observations

63,260

63,260

34,520

  1. Note: Likelihood ratio test in random effects logistic model: LR =1086.53, p < 0.0001
  2. Hausman’s specification test is not significant at the 5% level: χ 2(20) =1268.40, p < 0.0001