Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with HIV testing (N=10665)

From: Inequities in the utilization of HIV counseling and testing services among undergraduates in mainland China

Variables

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

P value AOR

AOR

95% CI

P value AOR

AOR

95% CI

P value AOR

AOR

95% CI

Block 1: Need factors

X12: Perception of HIV risk (0=Low, 1=High)

<0.001

3.95

2.95-5.30

<0.001

4.21

3.13-5.65

<0.001

2.76

2.02-3.78

X13: Condomless sex (0=No, 1=Yes)

0.010

1.39

1.08-1.79

0.005

1.44

1.12-1.85

0.048

1.29

1.00-1.67

X14: Early sexual debut (0=No, 1=Yes)

0.001

1.59

1.21-2.08

0.002

1.53

1.16-2.00

0.059

1.31

0.99-1.73

Block 2:Enabling factors

X9: Residential areas (0=Rural, 1=Urban)

   

0.084

1.14

0.98-1.33

0.199

1.11

0.95-1.29

X11: Knowledge of local AIDS service organization (0=No, 1=Yes)

   

0.000

1.50

1.30-1.74

<0.001

1.59

1.37-1.85

Block 3: Predisposing factors

X2: Sexual orientation * (Ref:Non-heterosexual men)

         

Non-heterosexual women

      

<0.001

0.51

0.37-0.72

Heterosexual men

      

<0.001

0.44

0.33-0.57

Heterosexual women

      

<0.001

0.31

0.24-0.41

X3: Major (0=Non-Medical,1=Medical)

      

<0.001

1.34

1.15-1.56

X4: Grade (0=Freshmen, 1=Non-freshmen)

      

0.022

1.22

1.03-1.45

X5: HIV-related knowledge (0=Low, 1=High)

      

0.007

0.80

0.69-0.94

X6: HIV-related stigma (0=High, 1=Low)

      

0.413

0.94

0.80-1.10

X7: Willingness to utilize HTC service (0=No, 1=Yes)

      

<0.001

0.68

0.56-0.81

X8: Necessity of providing HCT (0=No, 1=Yes)

      

<0.001

0.46

0.36-0.57

-2 Log likelihood

5675.28

5642.17

5446.02

Change of −2 log likelihood (χ2), d.f.

97.34,3

33.11,2

196.15,9

P value

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

  1. d.f. degree of freedom; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval