From: Co-design of a digital dietary intervention for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes
Characteristic | Workshop 1 | Workshop 2 | Workshop 3 | Total a | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stakeholder type, n | End-user | 8 | 7 | 11 | 20 |
Scientific/clinical experts | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Total | 12 | 9 | 12 | 33 | |
Sex, n | Female | 10 | 9 | 7 | 17 |
Age (years) | Median | 55 | 55 | 59.5 | 59 |
Range | 38–63 | 38–61 | 40–62 | 38–63 | |
Highest level of education attained, n | Year 12 or equivalent | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
Trade certificate or diploma | 3 | 3 | 5 | 9 | |
University degree (e.g., bachelor’s degree) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Postgraduate university degree | 5 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
Cultural identity, n | Australian | 10 | 8 | 9 | 19 |
Chinese | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
English | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
New Zealand | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
South African | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Irish | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Scottish | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Health status, n | Pre-diabetes | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Type 2 diabetes | 1 | 1 | 8 | 9 | |
None of the above | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |
Unsure | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Did not indicate in survey | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
Has other serious health conditions | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Index of disadvantage SEIFA b score by postal code residence, n | 1–25 (percentile) | n = 4 | n = 2 | n = 3 | n = 6 |
26–50 (percentile) | n = 3 | n = 3 | n = 4 | n = 8 | |
51–75 (percentile) | n = 0 | n = 2 | n = 1 | n = 2 | |
76–100 (percentile) | n = 5 | n = 2 | n = 4 | n = 8 |