Skip to main content

Table 4 Results from the SUS survey conducted during the interactive interviews

From: Evaluating the usability and acceptability of a geographical information system (GIS) prototype to visualise socio-economic and public health data

Participant ID

SUS Total Scorea

Statement 1b

Statement 2

Statement 3

Statement 4

Statement 5

Statement 6

Statement 7

Statement 8

Statement 9

Statement 10

VS 3

100

5

1

5

1

5

1

5

1

5

1

HCP 3

100

5

1

5

1

5

1

5

1

5

1

Expert 1

95

5

1

5

1

3

1

5

1

5

1

Expert 2

95

5

1

5

1

3

1

5

1

5

1

HCP 1

92.5

5

1

5

2

5

2

5

2

5

1

VS 2

90

5

2

5

2

4

1

5

1

5

2

Public 4

90

4

1

5

2

5

1

4

1

4

1

Public 3

87.5

4

1

5

2

5

1

4

1

4

2

Public 5

87.5

4

2

4

2

5

1

4

1

5

1

HCP 2

77.5

3

1

5

2

4

3

5

2

4

2

Public 1

75

4

1

4

2

4

2

5

2

4

4

Public 2

70

4

2

4

2

4

2

4

2

4

4

VS 1

70

4

3

5

5

3

1

5

2

4

2

Commissioner 1

70

2

1

4

1

3

2

4

3

4

2

Commissioner 2

47.5

2

2

4

5

3

3

4

3

3

4

Mean Scores

83.17

4.07

1.40

4.67

2.07

4.07

1.53

4.60

1.60

4.40

1.93

  1. aTotal SUS score calculated out of 100 using the tool scoring methodology described in ‘Data Collection & Analysis’
  2. bStatements for the SUS Survey: 1) I think that I would like to use this system frequently;2) I found the system unnecessarily complex;3) I thought the system was easy to use;4) I think I would need the support of a technical personal to be able to use this system;5) I found the various functions in the system were well integrated; 6) I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system;7) I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly; 8) I found the system very cumbersome to use;9) I felt very confident using this system; 10) I needed to learn a lot before I could get going with this system