Utilization of HIV testing and counselling services by women with disabilities during antenatal care in Uganda: analysis of 2016 demographic and health survey

Table 2 Proportions, Unadjusted and Adjusted Odd Ratios (with 95% Confidence Intervals). For HTC by Disability Status (N = 10,073)

HTC Indicator	No Disability (n = 8470		With disability (n = 1603)
Pre-test HIV counselling
Proportion^a, 95% CIs	59.6	58.2–61.1	52.4***	49.6–55.2
uOR, 95% CIs	Referent		0.75***	0.68–0.84
aOR^b, 95% CIs	Referent		0.83**	0.74–0.93
HIV test and obtaining results
Proportion ^a, 95% CIs	68.2	66.9–69.4	61.4***	58.7–64.1
uOR, 95% CIs	Referent		0.77***	0.69–0.86
aOR^b, 95% CIs	Referent		0.88**	0.78–0.99
Post-test HIV counselling^c
Proportion ^a, 95% CIs	55.5	54.1–56.9	51.6***	48.4–54.4
uOR, 95% CIs	Referent		0.85***	0.76–0.94
aOR^b, 95% CIs	Referent		0.93	0.84–1.04
All HTC services
Proportion ^a, 95% CIs	49.2	47.6–50.2	43.5***	40.6–46.4
uOR, 95% CIs	Referent		0.80***	0.72–0.89
aOR^b, 95% CIs	Referent		0.87***	0.78–0.97

Source: Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) 2016. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1
Notes: ^a Weighted proportions; ^bAdjusted for maternal age, education, marital status, number of living children, employment, household wealth, and residence. Boldface indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05). ^cSample size (N = 6956). Abbreviations: HTC = HIV testing and counselling, uOR = unadjusted Odd Ratios, aOR = adjusted Odd Ratios, CIs = Confidence Intervals

ISSN: 1471-2458