Skip to main content

Table 4 S&O combined weights of each evaluation index

From: Evaluation of the quality of COVID-19 prevention and control by a novel comprehensive evaluation model in a tertiary general hospital: a prospective observational study

Evaluation index

The importance rankings of indicators by the G1 method

Objective Weights (CRITIC method)

The ratio of the importance of indicators

Combination of S&O weights

X11, Sufficient rate of PPE

2

0.0655

1.0000

0.1079

X12, Adequacy rate of equipment and facilities

4

0.0752

1.0845

0.0995

X21, Standardized patient management rate

1

0.0642

\

0.1079

X31, Standard rate of sterile supplies management

10

0.0622

1.2391

0.0544

X41, Qualified rate of environmental cleaning and disinfection

9

0.0771

1.0000

0.0674

X51, HH compliance rate

8

0.0766

1.0143

0.0674

X52, Correct rate of HH

11

0.0697

1.0000

0.0544

X61, Correct use rate of PPE

3

0.0815

1.0000

0.1079

X62, Occupational protection knowledge awareness rate

7

0.0777

1.2173

0.0684

X71, Training rate of COVID-19 P&C knowledge of HcWs

6

0.0946

1.0000

0.0832

X72, Qualified rate of COVID-19 P&C knowledge assessment

5

0.0629

1.1955

0.0832

X81, Standard rate of medical waste disposal

13

0.0860

1.2419

0.0438

X82, Disposal standard rate of contaminated fabric

12

0.1069

1.0000

0.0544

  1. G1 Order Relation Analysis, CRITIC Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation, PPE Personal Protective Equipment, HH Hand Hygiene, COVID-19 Corona Virus Disease 2019, S&O Subjective and Objective, P&C Prevention and Control