Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of the complete sample (M = Mean; SD = standard deviation)

From: Are informal family caregivers stigmatized differently based on their gender or employment status?: a German study on public stigma towards informal long-term caregivers of older individuals

Stigma

M(SD) / N(%)

Emotional reaction to informal caregiving

 - Devaluing feelings

1.39 (.45)

 - Appreciative feelings

3.60 (.78)

 - Regretful and anxious feelings

2.68 (.93)

Social distance

1.89 (.69)

Cognitive reaction to informal caregiving

 - Accusing statements

2.03 (.63)

 - Devaluing statements

2.20 (.71)

 - Appreciative statements

4.34 (.63)

Sociodemographic data

 N

1037

 Age

52.33 (16.61)

 Gender (female)

508 (48.99)

Education – highest educational degree

 - Upper secondary school

360 (34.72)

 - Qualification for applied upper secondary school

115 (11.09)

 - Polytechnic Secondary School

80 (7.71)

 - Intermediate Secondary School

331 (31.92)

 - Lower Secondary School

144 (13.89)

 - Currently in school training/education

4 (0.39)

 - Without school-leaving qualification

2 (0.19)

Employment status

 - Employed

552 (53.23)

 - Retired

336 (32.40)

 - Not employed

149 (14.37)

Marital status

 - Married, living together

627 (60.46)

 - Married, living separately

41 (3.95)

 - Divorced

102 (9.84)

 - Widowed

47 (4.53)

 - Single

220 (21.22)

Vignettes

 Gender of the caregiver

  - Female

529 (51.01)

  - Male

508 (48.99)

 Working status of the caregiver

  - Yes, working

516 (49.76)

  - No, non-working

521 (50.24)

 Gender of the care recipient

  - Female (mother)

529 (51.01)

  - Male (father)

508 (48.99)

 Type of impairment of the care recipient

  - Physical impairment

546 (52.65)

  - Mental impairment

491 (47.35)