Skip to main content

Table 4 Control rankings for uniform centralized management

From: Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives

Initial condition, objective

Control intensity

 

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

Single case AB, min cases

VML, T=C=N

M=L, V, T=C=N

M=L, V, T=C=N

V=M=L, T=C=N

Single case AB, min deaths

VML, T=C=N

M=L, V, T=C=N

M=L, V, T=C=N

V=M=L, T=C=N

Outbreak B, min cases

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

VMLCredNT

Outbreak B, min deaths

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

MLVCredNT

Outbreak A, min cases

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

VMLCredNT

Outbreak A, min deaths

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

MLVredNTC

MLVCredNT

Outbreak A & B, min cases

MLV, N=T=C

MLV, N=T=C

MLV, N=T=C

VML, N=T=C

Outbreak A & B, min deaths

MLV, N=T=C

MLV, N=T=C

MLV, N=T=C

MLV, C=N=T

  1. Rankings of control types at four different control intensities and four sets of initial conditions (rankings are in order of most effective to least effective). N = no control, V = vaccination, L = isolation, M = medication, C = travel ban for all individuals, and T = travel ban for infected individuals only. Red text reflects scenarios in which no control outperforms a management option