From: Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
Study, Year | Site | Study design | Outcomes of interest | N | Follow up | Mean weight loss | Implementation implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ļ»æA Worksite Diabetes Prevention Program Two-Year Impact on Employee Health, 2006 [11] | ļ»æBD Medical, Sandy, Utah | ļ»æWithin- group study design | ļ»æWeight, body mass index, waist circumference, oral glucose tolerance testing, fasting insulin, blood lipids, and aerobic fitness | 22 (8āM, 14āF) | 2āyears | 0.76 lbs. | N/A |
*A Randomized Controlled Trial Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to a University Worksite, Ohio, 2012ā2014, 2016 [12] | ļ»æOhio State University | Pretestāposttest control group design | ļ»æPrimary outcome was percentage weight change; secondary outcomes were height, waist circumference, Biometrics, dietary intake, and PA levels | 35 | 3āmonths | 5.1 lbs. | ļ»æN/A |
*Early Weight-Loss Success Identifies Non-responders after a Lifestyle Intervention in a Worksite Diabetes Prevention Trial, 2015 [13] | ļ»æOhio State University | Pre and post intervention in randomized experimental group | ļ»æPercent weight loss | 32 (5āM, 27āF) | 4āmonths | ļ»æ16.7 lbs. in those who lost >ā5% weight & 5.6 lbs. in those who lost <ā5% weight | N/A |
*A translational worksite diabetes prevention trial improves psychosocial status, dietary intake, and step counts among employees with prediabetes: A randomized controlled trial, 2015 [14] | Ohio State University | ļ»æRandomized pretest/posttest control group design | ļ»æPsychosocial outcomes including self-efficacy for eating a low fat (LF) diet and PA, goal commitment and difficulty, employee ļ»æpresenteeism, social support, problem solving. | 35 | 3āmonths | N/A | ļ»æN/A |
Putting the National Diabetes Prevention Program to Work: Predictors of Achieving Weight-Loss Goals in an Employee Population, 2019 [15] | ļ»æVanderbilt University Medical Center | ļ»æExploratory analysis of data from DPP participants enrolled in the first 5 cohorts | ļ»æPrimary outcome was characteristics and program metrics for DPP participants. | 165 | 12āmonths | Ā | ļ»æSession attendance and physical activity independently predicted achievement of the 5% weight-loss goal in this worksite translation of the DPP. |
Mixed methods study of engagement in behaviors to prevent type 2 diabetes among employees with pre-diabetes, 2016 [16] | ļ»æUniversity of Michigan | Pre and post mixed methods study | ļ»æFacilitators of and barriers to engagement in recommended behaviors | 82 (23āM, 59āF) | 3āmonths | N/A | ļ»æKey facilitators of engagement included assistance and encouragement from social networks as well as use of external supports such as tracking devices. Barriers to engagement included competing demands and insufficient resources ļ»æfor healthy behaviors. |