Table 3 Multilevel mediation analysis of factors independently associated with consistent bed net use
Respondents’ characteristics | Bivariate regression with unadjusted odds ratio | Model 1 with ideation as a single mediator variable | Model 2 with domains of ideation as separate mediator variables |
|---|---|---|---|
COR (95%(CI) | AOR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
Ideation as a composite index | 1.44 (1.37–1.50) *** | 1.07 (1.06–1.08) *** | |
Domains of ideation | |||
Emotional domain | 1.64 (1.51–1.77) *** | 1.10 (1.08–1.12) *** | |
Cognitive domain | 1.46 (1.36–156) *** | 1.05 (1.03–1.07) *** | |
Social domain | 1.90 (1.63–2.22) *** | 1.07 (1.03–1.11) *** | |
Level of message recall | |||
No recall (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Low recall | .97 (.82–1.15) | 1.01 (.97–1.06) | 1.01 (.97–1.06) |
Moderate recall | .82 (.63–1.08) | .99 (.92–1.05) | .98 (.92–1.05) |
High recall | 2.65 (1.43–4.93) ** | 1.19 (1.04–1.35) ** | 1.18 (1.04–1.34) * |
Respondent resides in a location that received community intervention | |||
No (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Yes | 1.05 (0.98–1.12) | 1.05 (0.98–1.13) | |
Wealth index | |||
Poorest (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Second | 1.06 (1.00–1.13) | 1.06 (1.00–1.13) | |
Middle | 1.04 (.97–1.11) | 1.04 (.97–1.11) | |
Fourth | 1.05 (.98–1.23) | 1.05 (.97–1.12) | |
Richest | 1.03 (.95–1.11) * | 1.03 (.95–1.11) | |
State of residence | |||
Akwa Ibom (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Kebbi | 1.11 (1.01–1.23) * | 1.12 (1.01–1.24) * | |
Nasarawa | 1.10 (1.01–1.19) * | 1.10 (1.01–1.19) * | |
Age | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) * | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) * | |
Type of place of residence | |||
Rural (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Urban | .94 (.86–1.02) | .94 (.86–1.02) | |
Education level | |||
None (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Primary | 1.05 (.99–1.11) | 1.05 (.99–1.11) | |
Secondary | 1.04 (.98–1.10) | 1.04 (.98–1.10) | |
Tertiary | 1.01 (.93–1.10) | 1.01 (.93–1.10) | |
Religion | |||
Other religion (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Christian | .97 (.91–1.04) | .97 (.91–1.04) | |
Respondent resides in household with one net for every two residents | |||
No (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Yes | 1.11 (1.06–1.15) *** | 1.11 (1.06–1.15) *** | |
Respondent’s sex | |||
Male (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Female | 1.15 (1.10–1.20) *** | 1.15 (1.10–1.21) *** | |
Effect of level of recall on ideation | |||
No recall (ref) | 1.00 | ||
Low recall | 1.54 (1.34–1.78) *** | ||
Moderate recall | 1.71 (1.37–2.14) *** | ||
High recall | 3.03 (1.95–4.70) *** | ||
Effect of level of recall on emotional domain of ideation | |||
No recall (ref) | 1.00 | ||
Low recall | 1.23 (1.13–1.34) *** | ||
Moderate recall | 1.32 (1.15–1.51) *** | ||
High recall | 1.80 (1.37–2.34) *** | ||
Effect of level of recall on cognitive domain of ideation | |||
No recall (ref) | 1.00 | ||
Low recall | 1.26 (1.15–1.38) *** | ||
Moderate recall | 1.16 (1.00–1.34) * | ||
High recall | 1.55 (1.16–2.06) ** | ||
Effect of level of recall on social domain of ideation | |||
No recall (ref) | 1.00 | ||
Low recall | 1.03 (.99–1.08) | ||
Moderate recall | 1.15 (1.08–1.23) *** | ||
High recall | 1.15 (1.01–1.30) * | ||