Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of the quality appraisala

From: Experience of chronic noncommunicable disease in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-aggregation of qualitative studies

 

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

Abele [17] (2018)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

Bosire et al. [18] (2020)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

Y

Bosire [21] (2020)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

Corrigan et al. [22] (2020)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

Gonah et al. [23] (2020)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

Hing et al. [24] (2020)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

Mendenhall et al. [25] (2019)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Monroe et al. [26] (2013)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

U

Y

Morgan et al. [27] (2018)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

Muiruri et al. [28] (2020)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

Peer et al. [29] (2020)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

Simonik et al. [30] (2016)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

Slomka et al. [31] (2017)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

U

Y

Warren-Jeanpiere et al. [32] (2014)

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

U

Y

  1. aC1 = Congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology
  2. C2 = Congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives
  3. C3 = Congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect the data
  4. C4 = Congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of the data
  5. C5 = Congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of the results
  6. C6 = Statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically
  7. C7 = Statement of the influence of the researcher on the research
  8. C8 = Representation of the participants and their voices
  9. C9 = Ethical approval by an appropriate body
  10. C10 = Relationship between the conclusions and analysis or interpretation of the data
  11. Y Yes, N No, U Unclear, NA Not applicable
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us