Skip to main content

Table 4 CFIR construct ratings by school

From: Evaluation of a school-based participatory intervention to improve school environments using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Implementation level

Low

Intermediate

High

Distinguishing classification

School ID

1

2

3

4

5

 

I. Intervention characteristics

 Adaptability

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

 

 Complexitya

Missing

Missing

Missing

−2

−2

I

 General Intervention Logistic Complexity

0

−2

−1

+ 2

0 (mixed)

 

 Design Quality & Packaging

Missing

Missing

Missing

−1

0 (mixed)

I

II. Outer setting

 Participant Needs & Resources

−2

−1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

**

 Cosmopolitanism

Missing

0 (mixed)

+ 1

+ 1

+ 2

**

 External Policy & Incentives

+ 1

Missing

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

+ 1

 

III. Inner setting

 Social Structural Characteristics

−2

−2

+ 1

0 (mixed)

+ 1

*

 Networks & Communications

  Quality of Formal Communications

0 (mixed)

−1

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

 

  Social Capital

+ 2

−1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

 

 Culture

−1

−1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

*

 Implementation Climate

  Tension for Change

−2

−1

0 (mixed)

+ 2

+ 1

**

  Compatibility

+ 1

+ 1

+ 2

+ 2

+ 2

*

  Relative Priority

Missing

−1

−1

Missing

−1

 

  Organizational Incentives & Rewards

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

+ 1

I

 Readiness for Implementation

  Leadership Engagement

−1

−1

+ 1

+ 2

+ 1

**

  Available Resources

+ 1

−1

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

−1

 

  Access to Information & Knowledge

Missing

−1

+ 1

+ 1

0 (mixed)

*

IV. Characteristics of individuals

 Knowledge & Beliefs About the Intervention

Missing

−1

+ 1

+ 2

0 (mixed)

 

 Agency

−1

− 1

Missing

0 (mixed)

−2

 

 Individual Stage of Change

Missing

0 (mixed)

Missing

+ 2

+ 2

*

 Individual Identification with the Organization

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

+ 1

I

V. Process

 Planning

0 (mixed)

−1

+ 1

−1

+ 1

 

 Engaging

  Opinion Leaders

−1

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

I

  Formally Appointed Internal Implementation Leaders

+ 2

−1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

 

  Champions

0 (mixed)

−1

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

 

  External Change Agents

+ 1

−2

0 (mixed)

+ 1

+ 1

 

 Executing

0 (mixed)

−2

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

0 (mixed)

 

 Reflecting & Evaluating

Missing

−2

+ 1

+ 2

+ 1

**

  1. Key: Rating + or - indicates the valence of the construct on implementation, and 1 or 2 indicates the magnitude of the construct’s influence on implementation
  2. ** Strongly distinguishing construct
  3. * Weakly distinguishing construct
  4. I = Insufficient data to assess
  5. aConstruct is reverse rated (i.e., a positive rating denotes less complexity and vice versa)