Skip to main content

Table 4 CFIR construct ratings by school

From: Evaluation of a school-based participatory intervention to improve school environments using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Implementation level Low Intermediate High Distinguishing classification
School ID 1 2 3 4 5  
I. Intervention characteristics
Adaptability + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1  
Complexitya Missing Missing Missing −2 −2 I
 General Intervention Logistic Complexity 0 −2 −1 + 2 0 (mixed)  
Design Quality & Packaging Missing Missing Missing −1 0 (mixed) I
II. Outer setting
Participant Needs & Resources −2 −1 + 1 + 1 + 1 **
Cosmopolitanism Missing 0 (mixed) + 1 + 1 + 2 **
External Policy & Incentives + 1 Missing 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed) + 1  
III. Inner setting
Social Structural Characteristics −2 −2 + 1 0 (mixed) + 1 *
Networks & Communications
  Quality of Formal Communications 0 (mixed) −1 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed)  
  Social Capital + 2 −1 + 1 + 1 + 1  
Culture −1 −1 + 1 + 1 + 1 *
Implementation Climate
  Tension for Change −2 −1 0 (mixed) + 2 + 1 **
  Compatibility + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 2 *
  Relative Priority Missing −1 −1 Missing −1  
  Organizational Incentives & Rewards Missing Missing Missing Missing + 1 I
Readiness for Implementation
  Leadership Engagement −1 −1 + 1 + 2 + 1 **
  Available Resources + 1 −1 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed) −1  
  Access to Information & Knowledge Missing −1 + 1 + 1 0 (mixed) *
IV. Characteristics of individuals
Knowledge & Beliefs About the Intervention Missing −1 + 1 + 2 0 (mixed)  
Agency −1 − 1 Missing 0 (mixed) −2  
Individual Stage of Change Missing 0 (mixed) Missing + 2 + 2 *
Individual Identification with the Organization Missing Missing Missing Missing + 1 I
V. Process
Planning 0 (mixed) −1 + 1 −1 + 1  
Engaging
  Opinion Leaders −1 Missing Missing Missing Missing I
  Formally Appointed Internal Implementation Leaders + 2 −1 + 1 + 1 + 1  
  Champions 0 (mixed) −1 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed)  
  External Change Agents + 1 −2 0 (mixed) + 1 + 1  
Executing 0 (mixed) −2 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed) 0 (mixed)  
Reflecting & Evaluating Missing −2 + 1 + 2 + 1 **
  1. Key: Rating + or - indicates the valence of the construct on implementation, and 1 or 2 indicates the magnitude of the construct’s influence on implementation
  2. ** Strongly distinguishing construct
  3. * Weakly distinguishing construct
  4. I = Insufficient data to assess
  5. aConstruct is reverse rated (i.e., a positive rating denotes less complexity and vice versa)