From: What have we learned about COVID-19 volunteering in the UK? A rapid review of the literature
Authors and Year | Item type | Organisation | Type of source | Setting | Sample size (if relevant) | Study Design | Data collection period | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alakeson, V, Brett, W (2020) [30] | Report | Power to Change | Combination of primary + secondary | UK | Not stated | Collective input from stakeholders | Not stated | • Mutual aid works best at the micro level. • Mutual aid at scale requires community organisations • Community organisations have changed quickly to meet local need. • Bigger institutions rely on community organisations to respond well. |
Britain Thinks (2020) [31] | Report | West Midlands Recovery Coordination Group | Primary | West Midlands | 36 | Series of discussions with Citizen’s panel of local residents | 03/06/2020–02/07/2020 | • Priorities include getting back to normal safely, healthcare, mental health, education, employment, promoting and supporting business. |
Felici (2020) [32] | Blog post | Bennett Institute for Public Policy | Secondary | UK | N/A | Statistical analysis of geographic density of mutual aid groups | 27/03/2020 | • There is a positive correlation between density of mutual aid groups and measures of socio-economic advantage. |
Gardner, 2020 [33] | Newspaper article | The Telegraph | Secondary | UK | N/A | N/A | 07/04/2020–16/04/2020 | • NHS Volunteer army given fewer than 20,000 tasks since launch. |
Jones et al. (2020) [34] | Peer-reviewed article | University of the West of England | Primary | Bristol | 539 | Survey | 06/04/2020–20/04/2020 | • Members of Covid-19 support groups provided a wide range of support and cited a variety of successes and failures. • 46.7% of respondents wanted to become more involved in the neighbourhood in the future. • With respect to most measures there were no differences in the characteristics of support between respondents in areas of high and low deprivation. |
Kavada (2020) [35] | Blog post | Open Democracy | Secondary | UK | N/A | N/A | N/A | • The creation of “micro-groups” in specific areas helped to create trust • Mutual aid groups used a variety of digital tools to organise. • The decentralised organising model of mutual aid groups is faster and more agile than the centralised model. • Mutual aid groups may become involved in political campaigns regarding the broader impact of the pandemic. |
Local Government Association (2020) [36] | Website | Local Government Association | Secondary | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | • Large repository of case studies of good council practice in response to Covid-19. |
Locality, 2020 [37] | Report | Locality | Primary | Berwick, Grimsby, Norfolk, Holburn, Levenshulme, Hackney, Coventry | 7 case study interviews; 57 survey responses | Case study interviews with community leaders; qualitative survey; member roundtables; contributions from local authority leaders | Not stated | • Existing social infrastructure was crucial to the crisis response. • The crisis has created new and improved partnership working between community organisations and the public sector. • Community organisations have connected different layers of response. • Managing new volunteering capacity came with challenges • Community organisations have adapted at pace but require support for the future. |
Mak & Fancourt, 2020 [38] | Peer-reviewed article | UCL | Primary | UK | 31,890 | Survey of Covid-19 volunteers | 21/04/2020–03/05/2020 | • Three types of Covid-19 volunteering identified: formal volunteering, social action volunteering, neighbourhood support. • Volunteering was associated being female, living with children, living rurally, having higher educational qualifications, and higher household income. • New groups identified as likely to volunteer were people with a physical or mental health condition. • The predictors of volunteering during the pandemic may be slightly different from other non-emergency period. |
McCabe, A., Wilson, M., & MacMillan, A. E. (2020) [39] | Briefing | Local Trust | Primary | 26 areas in England | Not stated | “Learning conversations” with residents, community activists and workers; Interviews with Big Local reps | 04/2020–06/2020 | • Communities have been resourceful in developing creative ways of bringing resources together to respond quickly to community need, using technical knowledge to implement alternative ways of working; applying local knowledge to meet immediate needs; promoting acknowledged roles. |
McCabe, A., Wilson, M., & Macmillan, R. (2020) [40] | Report | Local Trust | Primary | 26 areas in England | 317 conversations; 20 Interviews | “Learning conversations” with residents, community activists and workers; Interviews with Big Local reps | 04/2020–09/2020 | • Community responses to the immediate crisis have varied significantly. • Most communities have moved on from an initial crisis response and are looking ahead. • An established community-led infrastructure underpins an effective community response. |
McCabe, A., Wilson, M., & Paine, A. E. (2020) [41] | Briefing | Local Trust | Primary | 26 areas in England | Not stated | “Learning conversations” with residents, community activists and workers; Interviews with Big Local reps | 04/2020–10/2020 | • A new cohort of volunteers has emerged who are often younger and on the furlough scheme. • Engagement at grassroots level has been more effective than command-and-control. • Factors identified as important in the successful retention of volunteers include clear boundaries, permissions, social rewards, nurturing relationships, feeling valued. |
NewLocal, 2020 [42] | Report | New Local | Primary | UK | 94 | Survey of local government leaders, chief executives and council mayors | 9/04/2020–21/04/2020 | • 95.6% of respondents highly value the contribution of community groups in their council’s effort to tackle Covid-19 (47.4% very significant, 48.2% significant). • Council chiefs are more confident there is community cohesion in their area, with confidence levels at 71.9% |
NHS England (2020) [5] | Website | NHS | Primary | N/A | N/A | N/A | 27/03/2020–29/03/2020 | • The NHS Volunteer responders initiative has recruited 750,000 people in 2 days. |
O’Dwyer (2020) [43] | Blog post | Kingston University | Primary | UK | 854 | Survey of mutual aid group members | Not stated | • Participants are predominantly white, female, middle class, and more political than average. • Participants were generally left wing but tended not to see their mutual aid groups as political. |
Scottish Government (2020) [44] | Report | Scottish Government | Primary | Scotland | 62 | Qualitative survey of community organisations | 15/05/2020–27/05/2020 | • The pandemic has prompted large changes to the operations of respondents. • Covid-19 has presented increased demands, most prominently the provision of food. • Half of participants mentioned improved partnership working. • Priorities for the future include mental health support, employment, building a wellbeing and low carbon economy, tackling inequalities, capitalising on rise in community support. |
Spratt (2020) [45] | Newspaper article | The i | Secondary | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | • ACORN have seen a large increase in membership over Covid-19. • ACORN have been holding “eviction resistance” bootcamps to tackle the rise in evictions. |
Taylor and Wilson (2020) [46] | Report | Community Organisers | Combination of primary + secondary | UK | Not stated | Literature review; Interviews with people involved in community organising | Not stated | • Communities with an organising history were able to respond quickly and flexibly as previous community organising activity meant that local people were already connected. • Vast majority of support provided was “practical help” including delivering food, collecting prescriptions, making check-in calls. • Organisers adapted to the need to go online through use of technology but also developed methods for reaching the digitally excluded. • Community organisers have supported residents to challenge government policies and practices. |
Tiratelli (2020b) [47] | Blog post | New Local | Secondary | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | • The activity of mutual aid groups declined sharply when lockdown eased. • Many mutual aid groups are dormant but the infrastructure they have created remains. • Mutual aid groups may spring back into action if a second lockdown occurs. |
Tiratelli & Kaye, 2020 [48] | Report | New Local | Combination of primary + secondary | UK | Not stated | Literature review; Observation of mutual aid groups’ social media; Interviews with mutual aid participants | Not stated | • Some mutual aid groups form spontaneously and others as outgrowths from existing community projects • Digital infrastructure was important • The furlough scheme led to a different demographic profile of volunteers than usual • Activities of mutual aid groups have evolved to encompass wider social support over time • Councils should adopt facilitative approaches to working with Mutual Aid groups rather than controlling or indifferent approaches. |
Tiratelli, 2020a [49] | Report | New Local | Combination of primary + secondary | UK | Number of interviews not stated | Literature review; Interviews with experts on the topic of community mobilisation | Not stated | • Community engagement is a shallower process than community mobilisation. • Approaches to community mobilisation can focus on different units: individuals, groups, places, and services. • Public bodies interested in community mobilisation need to: take a facilitative approach; listen to communities; build something that was not there before; have clear goals. |
Volunteer Scotland, 2020 [50] | Report | Volunteer Scotland | Primary | Scotland | 4827 | Survey of charities | 05/05/2020–15/05/2020 | • 37% of charity volunteers have been unable to work during COVID-19. |
VSF (2020) [51] | Report | Primary | Secondary | N/A | 13 | Collective input from Volunteering Support Fund projects | Not stated | • Many projects shifted their operations to the online world. • Support was offered to volunteers and service users with using technology. • Many projects reported increase in volunteer recruitment. • Projects adapted to respond to the pandemic, some changing their focus entirely. |
Wein (2020) [52] | Report | Dignity Project | Primary | UK | 182 | Survey of mutual aid group members | 11/05/2020–30/05/2020 | • In 53% of groups a small group of people made the decisions whilst 33% had more consensual decision-making. • Support on technology and communication was most desired by groups (32%) • 83% of respondents intended to take some political action in the coming year and 49% will take at least 3 actions. • Demographics: 65% female, median age 48, 48% earned less than median income, better educated were overrepresented. |
Wilson, McCabe & MacMillan (2020) [53] | Briefing | Local Trust | Primary | 26 areas in England | Not stated | “Learning conversations” with residents, community activists and workers; Interviews with Big Local reps | 04/2020–08/2020 | • Informality has assisted the speed and flexibility of responses to Covid-19 but scaling is an issue. • Organisations have been mixing both formal and informal ways of working. • Pre-existing community infrastructure has facilitated the co-ordination of responses to Covid-19. |