Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of the double-hurdle models for unorganized sports

From: Sports participation of children and adolescents in Germany: disentangling the influence of parental socioeconomic status

Unorganized sport

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Linear

Probit

Linear

Probit

Linear

Probit

Linear

Probit

SES (z-score)

−0.05**

0.05**

−0.05**

0.01

−0.05**

0.01

−0.04

0.05**

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

Opportunities (z-score)

  

0.06**

0.04*

0.06**

0.04**

0.05*

0.04*

  

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

Support (z-score)

  

−0.01

0.09***

−0.01

0.09***

−0.01

0.09***

  

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

Gender (female)

    

−0.20***

−0.00

−0.19***

− 0.01

    

(0.04)

(0.03)

(0.04)

(0.04)

Mig. back.

    

−0.02

−0.07

−0.01

− 0.03

    

(0.08)

(0.07)

(0.08)

(0.07)

Gender#mig. Back.

    

−0.08

0.03

−0.08

0.02

    

(0.11)

(0.09)

(0.11)

(0.10)

Age

 - 11-13

      

0.17***

−0.01

      

(0.05)

(0.04)

 - 14-17

      

0.15**

0.17***

      

(0.05)

(0.05)

Cohort (2001–2011)

      

−0.08

−0.24***

      

(0.04)

(0.04)

District size (20 k+)

      

0.01

−0.11**

      

(0.04)

(0.03)

Constant

4.48***

−0.13***

4.48***

−0.13***

4.58***

−0.12***

4.51***

0.01

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.03)

(0.02)

(0.05)

(0.05)

Lnsigma Constant

 

−0.07***

 

−0.07***

 

−0.08***

 

−0.09***

 

(0.01)

 

(0.01)

 

(0.01)

 

(0.01)

N

 

6044.00

 

6044.00

 

6044.00

 

6044.00

  1. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 *SE in parentheses; (source: MoMo/KiGGS)