Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of the double-hurdle models for unorganized sports

From: Sports participation of children and adolescents in Germany: disentangling the influence of parental socioeconomic status

Unorganized sport (1) (2) (3) (4)
Linear Probit Linear Probit Linear Probit Linear Probit
SES (z-score) −0.05** 0.05** −0.05** 0.01 −0.05** 0.01 −0.04 0.05**
(0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02)
Opportunities (z-score)    0.06** 0.04* 0.06** 0.04** 0.05* 0.04*
   (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02)
Support (z-score)    −0.01 0.09*** −0.01 0.09*** −0.01 0.09***
   (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02)
Gender (female)      −0.20*** −0.00 −0.19*** − 0.01
     (0.04) (0.03) (0.04) (0.04)
Mig. back.      −0.02 −0.07 −0.01 − 0.03
     (0.08) (0.07) (0.08) (0.07)
Gender#mig. Back.      −0.08 0.03 −0.08 0.02
     (0.11) (0.09) (0.11) (0.10)
Age
 - 11-13        0.17*** −0.01
       (0.05) (0.04)
 - 14-17        0.15** 0.17***
       (0.05) (0.05)
Cohort (2001–2011)        −0.08 −0.24***
       (0.04) (0.04)
District size (20 k+)        0.01 −0.11**
       (0.04) (0.03)
Constant 4.48*** −0.13*** 4.48*** −0.13*** 4.58*** −0.12*** 4.51*** 0.01
(0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.03) (0.02) (0.05) (0.05)
Lnsigma Constant   −0.07***   −0.07***   −0.08***   −0.09***
  (0.01)   (0.01)   (0.01)   (0.01)
N   6044.00   6044.00   6044.00   6044.00
  1. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 *SE in parentheses; (source: MoMo/KiGGS)