Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of the double-hurdle models for organized sports

From: Sports participation of children and adolescents in Germany: disentangling the influence of parental socioeconomic status

Organized sports

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Linear

Probit

Linear

Probit

Linear

Probit

Linear

Probit

SES (z-score)

0.03**

0.25***

0.01

0.12***

0.01

0.12***

0.03*

0.11***

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

Opportunities (z-score)

  

0.09***

0.05**

0.09***

0.05**

0.06***

0.07***

  

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

Support (z-score)

  

0.07***

0.49***

0.07***

0.50***

0.07***

0.49***

  

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

Gender (female)

    

− 0.23***

−0.26***

− 0.23***

−0.25***

    

(0.02)

(0.04)

(0.02)

(0.04)

Mig. back. (yes)

    

−0.05

0.04

−0.03

0.04

    

(0.05)

(0.07)

(0.04)

(0.08)

Gender#mig. Back.

    

−0.01

−0.13

−0.02

−0.12

    

(0.07)

(0.10)

(0.07)

(0.10)

Age

 - 11-13

      

0.26***

−0.04

      

(0.03)

(0.05)

 - 14-17

      

0.33***

−0.28***

      

(0.03)

(0.05)

Cohort (2001–2011)

      

−0.14***

0.02

      

(0.03)

(0.04)

District size (20 k+)

      

0.06**

−0.05

      

(0.02)

(0.04)

Constant

5.01***

0.44***

4.99***

0.48***

5.10***

0.62***

4.98***

0.74***

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.03)

(0.03)

(0.06)

Lnsigmaa Constant

 

−0.34***

 

−0.36***

 

−0.37***

 

−0.41***

 

(0.01)

 

(0.01)

 

(0.01)

 

(0.01)

N

 

6100.00

 

6100.00

 

6100.00

 

6100.00

  1. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 *SE in parentheses; (Source: MoMo/KiGGS)
  2. a Information about standard deviation of error term