Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of the double-hurdle models for organized sports

From: Sports participation of children and adolescents in Germany: disentangling the influence of parental socioeconomic status

Organized sports (1) (2) (3) (4)
Linear Probit Linear Probit Linear Probit Linear Probit
SES (z-score) 0.03** 0.25*** 0.01 0.12*** 0.01 0.12*** 0.03* 0.11***
(0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02)
Opportunities (z-score)    0.09*** 0.05** 0.09*** 0.05** 0.06*** 0.07***
   (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02)
Support (z-score)    0.07*** 0.49*** 0.07*** 0.50*** 0.07*** 0.49***
   (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02)
Gender (female)      − 0.23*** −0.26*** − 0.23*** −0.25***
     (0.02) (0.04) (0.02) (0.04)
Mig. back. (yes)      −0.05 0.04 −0.03 0.04
     (0.05) (0.07) (0.04) (0.08)
Gender#mig. Back.      −0.01 −0.13 −0.02 −0.12
     (0.07) (0.10) (0.07) (0.10)
Age
 - 11-13        0.26*** −0.04
       (0.03) (0.05)
 - 14-17        0.33*** −0.28***
       (0.03) (0.05)
Cohort (2001–2011)        −0.14*** 0.02
       (0.03) (0.04)
District size (20 k+)        0.06** −0.05
       (0.02) (0.04)
Constant 5.01*** 0.44*** 4.99*** 0.48*** 5.10*** 0.62*** 4.98*** 0.74***
(0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.02) (0.03) (0.03) (0.06)
Lnsigmaa Constant   −0.34***   −0.36***   −0.37***   −0.41***
  (0.01)   (0.01)   (0.01)   (0.01)
N   6100.00   6100.00   6100.00   6100.00
  1. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 *SE in parentheses; (Source: MoMo/KiGGS)
  2. a Information about standard deviation of error term