Skip to main content

Table 3 The association between informal caregiving and clinically diagnosed depression and anxiety by informal caregiving (n = 9340a)

From: Informal care and the impact on depression and anxiety among Swedish adults: a population-based cohort study

 

No. of participants

No. of cases

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)b

Model 1

Model 2

Diagnosed depression

 No caregiving

8558

214

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

 Caregiving without limitations

312

5

0.64 (0.26–1.56)

0.71 (0.29–1.74)

 Caregiving with limitations

470

23

1.98 (1.29–3.04)

1.97 (1.27–3.05)

Diagnosed anxiety

 No caregiving

8558

152

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

 Caregiving without limitations

312

4

0.72 (0.27–1.95)

0.91 (0.33–2.46)

 Caregiving with limitations

470

14

1.68 (0.97–2.90)

1.86 (1.06–3.25)

  1. aSix participants were excluded because the diagnosis of the outcome occurred before assessment of the exposure
  2. bModel 1 was a crude model; model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, social support and socio-economic position