Skip to main content

Table 2 The association between informal caregiving and self-reported depressive symptoms and anxious distress at baseline and 10-year follow-up

From: Informal care and the impact on depression and anxiety among Swedish adults: a population-based cohort study

 

No. of participants

No. of cases

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval)a

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Baseline (n = 9346)

Self-reported depressive symptoms

  No caregiving

8562

1683

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

 

  Caregiving without limitations

312

53

0.83 (0.62–1.12)

0.96 (0.70–1.32)

 

  Caregiving with limitations

472

146

1.85 (1.52–2.26)

2.00 (1.63–2.47)

 

Self-reported anxious distress

  No caregiving

8562

714

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

 

  Caregiving without limitations

312

20

0.76 (0.48–1.20)

0.89 (0.55–1.45)

 

  Caregiving with limitations

472

69

1.91 (1.46–2.49)

2.07 (1.57–2.74)

 

10-year follow-up (n = 5108)

Self-reported depressive symptoms

  No caregiving

4626

721

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

  Caregiving without limitations

197

22

0.68 (0.44–1.07)

0.82 (0.52–1.31)

0.86 (0.53–1.40)

  Caregiving with limitations

285

60

1.43 (1.07–1.91)

1.44 (1.06–1.96)

1.13 (0.81–1.57)

Self-reported anxious distress

  No caregiving

4626

269

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

  Caregiving without limitations

197

10

0.87 (0.45–1.66)

1.04 (0.53–2.03)

1.11 (0.56–2.19)

  Caregiving with limitations

285

24

1.49 (0.97–2.31)

1.52 (0.96–2.41)

1.23 (0.76–1.99)

  1. aModel 1 was a crude model; model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, social support and socio-economic position; model 3 was additionally adjusted for baseline MDI or rating scale for anxious distress for each outcome respectively