Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of logistic regression models of factors predicting higher work ability regarding mental demands

From: Work-life balance predicted work ability two years later: a cohort study of employees in the Swedish energy and water sector

  

Crude

OR 95% CI

Model 1

OR 95% CI

Model 2

OR 95% CI

Model 3

OR 95% CI

Model 4

OR 95% CI

Work-life balance

WIPLa

2.05** (1.46 to 2.88)

1.76** (1.23 to 2.51)

1.78** (1.22 to 2.59)

1.92** (1.29 to 2.87)

1.59* (1.03 to 2.44)

PLIWa

3.35** (1.78 to 6.34)

2.44** (1.27 to 4.68)

2.60** (1.33 to 5.11)

3.38** (1.64 to 6.96)

2.88** (1.31 to 6.32)

Employment

Company

     

Company 1

1

 

1

1

1

Company 2

2.36* (1.12 to 4.90)

 

2.20 (0.84 to 5.74)

2.47 (0.91 to 6.71)

2.38 (0.83 to 6.83)

Company 3

1.38 (0.64 to 2.97)

 

1.30 (0.49 to 3.48)

1.46 (0.54 to 3.99)

1.27 (0.44 to 3.68)

Position at work

     

Production

1

 

1

1

1

Administration

0.80 (0.44 to 1.47)

 

0.95 (0.48 to 1.87)

0.71 (0.32 to 1.56)

0.66 (0.28 to 1.56)

Manager

0.83 (0.38 to 1.83)

 

1.02 (0.41 to 2.50)

0.71 (0.270 to 1.87)

0.80 (0.29 to 2.23)

Experience of leadership qualityb

1.46* (1.05 to 2.04)

 

1.58* (1.10 to 2.28)

1.65** (1.13 to 2.40)

1.49* (1.003 to 2.21)

Demographic

Gender

     

Male

1

  

1

1

Female

0.86 (0.53 to 1.42)

  

0.72 (0.33 to 1.55)

0.68 (0.29 to 1.58)

Age

1.00 (0.97 to 1.03)

  

0.99 (0.96 to 1.02)

1.00 (0.96 to 1.03)

Education level

     

University

1

  

1

1

Secondary school or equal

0.83 (0.45 to 1.54)

  

1.11 (0.44 to 2.77)

1.28 (0.46 to 3.53)

Compulsory school

1.51 (0.78 to 2.95)

  

3.39* (1.06 to 10.82)

3.85* (1.07 to 13.86)

Baseline work ability regarding mental demands

Lower at T0

1

   

1

Higher at T0

6.92** (3.74 to 12.78)

   

5.55** (2.75 to 11.20)

Nagelkerke R Square (R2)

 

16%

21%

26%

38%

ΔR2

  

5%

5%

12%

  1. Odds ratio (OR), 95% CI: 95% confidence interval of factors predicting higher work ability regarding mental demands. Work ability regarding mental demands was dichotomized into lower work ability (=0) and higher
  2. work ability (=1) *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01 aWork interference with personal life (WIPL) and personal life interference with work (PLIW), was both three item index scales, ranging from 1 to 5. bExperience with leadership quality was measured with an index, ranging from 1 to 6. Model 1 = PLIW+WIPL, Model 2 = Model 1 + company+position at work+experience of leadership quality, Model 3 = Model 2 + gender+age + education level, Model 4 = Model 3 + baseline work ability regarding mental demands