Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of logistic regression models of factors predicting higher work ability regarding physical demands

From: Work-life balance predicted work ability two years later: a cohort study of employees in the Swedish energy and water sector

  

Crude

OR 95% CI

Model 1

OR 95% CI

Model 2

OR 95% CI

Model 3

OR 95% CI

Model 4

OR 95% CI

Work-life balance

WIPLa

1.49** (1.10 to 2.00)

1.41* (1.03 to 1.93)

1.62** (1.15 to 2.30)

1.84** (1.27 to 2.69)

1.60* (1.07 to 2.40)

PLIWa

1.61 (0.98 to 2.65)

1.33 (0.78 to 2.26)

1.39 (0.79 to 2.45)

1.60 (0.86 to 2.98)

1.41 (0.72 to 2.76)

Employment

Company

     

Company 1

1

 

1

1

1

Company 2

1.81 (0.99 to 3.30)

 

1.54 (0.64 to 3.72)

1.81 (0.72 to 4.57)

1.52 (0.55 to 4.17)

Company 3

2.61* (1.15 to 5.92)

 

1.70 (0.69 to 4.20)

2.00 (0.78 to 5.12)

1.42 (0.51 to 3.98)

Position at work

     

Production

1

 

1

1

1

Administration

0.77 (0.40 to 1.47)

 

2.28* (1.17 to 4.46)

1.61 (0.77 to 3.39)

1.55 (0.69 to 3.49)

Manager

1.15 (0.48 to 2.79)

 

3.31** (1.33 to 8.26)

2.49 (0.94 to 6.59)

1.91 (0.67 to 5.40)

Experience of leadership qualityb

1.68** (1.21 to 2.33)

 

1.59** (1.12 to 2.27)

1.62** (1.13 to 2.33)

1.51* (1.02 to 2.22)

Demographic

Gender

     

Male

1

  

1

1

Female

1.53 (0.92 to 2.56)

  

1.36 (0.64 to 2.89)

1.95 (0.85 to 4.49)

Age

0.99 (0.96 to 1.01)

  

0.98 (0.95 to 1.02)

0.99 (0.95 to 1.02)

Education level

     

University

1

  

1

1

Secondary school or equal

1.40 (0.76 to 2.58)

  

0.98 (0.42 to 2.30)

0.96 (0.38 to 2.44)

Compulsory school

3.49** (1.72 to 7.08)

  

2.75 (0.92 to 8.25)

2.06 (0.63 to 6.76)

Baseline work ability regarding physical demands

Lower at T0

1

   

1

Higher at T0

6.70** (3.70 to 12.14)

   

5.43** (2.78 to 10.62)

Nagelkerke R Square (R2)

 

5%

17%

22%

35%

ΔR2

  

12%

5%

13%

  1. Odds ratio (OR), 95% CI: 95% confidence interval of factors predicting higher work ability regarding physical demands. Work ability regarding physical demands was dichotomized into lower work ability (=0) and higher work ability (=1) *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01 aWork interference with personal life (WIPL) and personal life interference with work (PLIW), was both three item index scales, ranging from 1 to 5. bExperience with leadership quality was measured with an index, ranging from 1 to 6. Model 1 = WIPL+PLIW, Model 2 = Model 1 + company+position at work+experience of leadership quality, Model 3 = Model 2 + gender+age + education level, Model 4 = Model 3 + baseline work ability regarding physical demands