Study specific challenges underpinning the implementation framework | Lessons learnt and future recommendations |
---|---|
Partner/provider characteristics | |
Local government structure and communication Departments within local governments sometimes work in silos, with lack of reciprocal communication in the process of the park revitalisation plan | Understand the structure within the Council and identify the relevant teams/departments in the initial planning phase (Infrastructure and Active Ageing) Early identification of which department will be responsible for site management |
Partnership agreement | A formal agreement is recommended to seal commitment and expectations of both parties |
Policy for shade cover for playground Often lack of funding and policy can hinder installation of safe shade cover | Educate and advocate to Council staff to adopt/update shade policy and ensure urban planners incorporate shade into outdoor site design |
Timing flexibility and budget constraints Lack of alignment between research conduct timing and site construction work | Advanced planning should take place while taking into account the lengthy internal process required by local governments Adapt a flexible approach to the study design for a realistic and practical execution |
Community factors | |
Priority area for safe use of specialised outdoor equipment Equipment might be used by other age groups which can create clashes and safety risks for older people | Priority signage at the site and clear communication are needed to create public awareness for safe usage of all age groups |
Community engagement and seniors involvement | Encourage engagement of senior ambassadors and involvement of end users throughout the research project |
Promotion and communication strategies specific for older people Online platforms might not be accessible by older people | Identification of strategies that are relevant for older people for better community reach are recommended |