Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of effect on health, work and social activities among informal caregivers

From: Factors associated with informal caregiving and its effects on health, work, and social activities of adult informal caregivers in Malaysia: findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019

Factor

Effect on health

Effect on work

Effect on social activities

Crude OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Crude OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Crude OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Care recipient’s need for care

 Type of care provided

  Healthcarea,b,c

   Yes

1.03 (0.41, 2.65)

 

1.41 (0.62, 3.18)

 

1.24 (0.53, 2.90)

 

   No

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Personal care and othersb,c

   Yes

2.13 (0.63, 7.32)

2.25 (0.62,8.20)

1.55 (0.65, 3.69)

 

1.46 (0.62, 3.41)

 

   No

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 

Individual dispositional factors

 Sex

  Male

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  Female

3.67 (1.93,6.98)

3.63 (1.73, 7.61)***

1.60 (0.98, 2.62)

1.51 (0.95,2.40)

2.16 (1.21,3.88)

1.96 (1.04, 3.69)*

 Age group (years)

  18–34

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  35–59

1.29 (0.55, 0.03)

1.00 (0.41, 2.47)

1.32 (0.68, 2.57)

1.24 (0.66, 2.32)

0.95 (0.47,1.95)

0.84 (0.41,1.68)

  60 and above

1.67 (0.65, 4.28)

0.85 (0.29, 2.46)

1.41 (0.55, 3.57)

1.15 (0.50, 2.64)

1.00 (0.44, 2.28)

0.74 (0.31,1.72)

 Marital statusa,b,c

  Not married

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Married

1.09 (0.55,2.13)

 

0.83 (0.44, 1.56)

 

0.84 (0.46, 1.52)

 

 Ethnicitya

  Malay

Ref

 

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  Non-malay

0.96 (0.53,1.75)

 

2.16 (1.28, 3.67)

2.15 (1.29,3.58)**

1.72 (0.95, 3.13)

1.77 (0.99,3.16)

 Education levela,b,c

  No formal education

1.98 (0.46, 8.53)

 

0.93 (0.33, 2.60)

 

1.16 (0.31, 4.29)

 

  Primary

1.35 (0.48,3.77)

 

1.54 (0.62, 3.82)

 

1.02 (0.41, 2.58)

 

  Secondary

1.17 (0.55,2.49)

 

1.45 (0.65, 3.24)

 

1.12 (0.53, 2.35)

 

  Tertiary

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Employment statusb

  No

1.77 (0.99,3.19)

0.85 (0.41, 1.75)

1.28 (0.71, 2.32)

 

1.46 (0.84, 2.56)

1.12 (0.60,2.08)

  Yes

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

Ref

 Household income groupb,c

  Low

1.62 (0.58,4.48)

2.11 (0.94, 4.74)

1.23 (0.46, 3.30)

 

1.57 (0.73, 3.40)

 

  Middle

0.88 (0.32,2.36)

2.15 (0.95, 4.89)

1.32 (0.51, 3.44)

 

1.15 (0.52,2.54)

 

  High

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Residencya

  Urban

0.99 (0.55,1.79)

 

1.46 (0.87, 2.45)

1.36 (0.81, 2.29)

1.58 (0.87,2.89)

1.48 (0.83,2.65)

  Rural

Ref

 

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Received training

  No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  Yes

1.93 (1.05, 3.54)

2.10 (1.10,4.00)*

1.84 (0.95,3.54)

2.07 (1.10, 3.89)*

1.84 (1.02,3.33)

2.19 (1.22,3.93)**

 Duration of careb

  Less than 2 years

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

Ref

  2 years and more

1.87 (1.11, 3.16)

1.91 (1.08, 3.37)*

1.03 (0.57,1.88)

 

1.87 (1.05,3.32)

1.91 (0.98,3.70)

 Intensity of care (in a week)a,b,c

  19 h and less

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

  20 h and above

0.78 (0.42, 1.44)

 

1.11 (0.61, 2.02)

 

1.19 (0.65,2.19)

 

 Self-reported illnessb,c

  No

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Yes

1.64 (0.89, 3.03)

1.53 (0.84, 2.76)

1.18 (0.61, 2.30)

 

0.92 (0.52, 1.64)

 

 Perceived health statusb,c

  Very poor to fair

1.86 (0.97, 3.59)

1.58 (0.77, 3.27)

0.97 (0.55, 1.73)

 

1.29 (0.67,2.47)

 

  Good to excellent

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Presence of DM, HPT or HPCb,c

  No

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Yes

2.03 (1.08, 3.8)

1.74 (0.82, 3.70)

1.12 (0.61, 2.06)

 

0.92 (0.50,1.69)

 

Contextual factors

 Living in the same householda,b,c

  No

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Yes

1.09 (0.38, 3.12)

 

0.94 (0.43,2.02)

 

1.31 (0.46,3.72)

 

 Had assistance

  No

2.12 (1.14, 3.93)

1.74 (0.88, 3.45)

1.99 (1.01, 3.93)

2.02 (1.06,3.83)*

1.87 (1.01,3.45)

1.66 (0.92,3.00)

  Yes

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  1. CI Confidence Interval, OR Odds Ratio, Ref Reference category, DM Diabetes Mellitus, HPT Hypertension, HPC, Hypercholesterolemia; a p-value > 0.25 for univariate analysis effect on health; b p-value > 0.25 for univariate analysis effect on work; c p-value > 0.25 for univariate analysis effect on social; * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01; ***p-value < 0.001; # including other assistance. Area under ROC curve for model effect on health = 0.7495; Area under ROC curve for model effect on work = 0.6716; Area under ROC curve for model effect on social = 0.6876