| |
Homeless services received
|
No homeless services
|
|---|
| |
Stable Housing
|
ICD10 code only
|
|---|
| |
Yes
|
Hybrid
|
No
| | |
|---|
| |
N = 3017
|
N = 809
|
N = 5444
|
N = 2177
|
|---|
| |
N
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
|---|
|
Age category, years
|
|
≤ 20
|
97
|
3.2*
|
35
|
4.3
|
177
|
3.2*
|
97
|
4.5
|
|
21 to 44
|
765
|
25.4*
|
229
|
28.3*
|
2177
|
40.0*
|
769
|
35.3
|
|
45 to 64
|
1882
|
62.4*
|
485
|
60.0*
|
2699
|
49.6
|
1042
|
47.9
|
|
65 to 74
|
162
|
5.4*
|
33
|
4.1*
|
198
|
3.6*
|
151
|
6.9
|
|
75 to 89
|
16
|
0.5*
|
< 10
|
< 1.0*
|
44
|
0.8*
|
43
|
2.0
|
|
≥ 90
|
39
|
1.3
|
< 10
|
< 1.0
|
46
|
0.8
|
27
|
1.2
|
|
Missing
|
56
|
1.9
|
19
|
2.3
|
103
|
1.9
|
48
|
2.2
|
|
Race
|
|
Non-Hispanic black
|
2335
|
77.4*
|
616
|
76.1*
|
3857
|
70.8*
|
1199
|
55.1
|
|
Non-Hispanic white
|
331
|
11.0*
|
98
|
12.1*
|
895
|
16.4*
|
526
|
24.2
|
|
Hispanic
|
123
|
4.1*
|
35
|
4.3*
|
286
|
5.2*
|
207
|
9.5
|
|
Non-Hispanic Asian
|
16
|
0.5
|
< 10
|
< 1.0
|
30
|
0.6
|
12
|
0.6
|
|
Other/unknown
|
212
|
7.0*
|
53
|
6.6*
|
376
|
6.9*
|
244
|
11.2
|
|
Sex
|
|
Male
|
1633
|
54.1*
|
498
|
61.6*
|
3484
|
64.0*
|
1484
|
68.2
|
|
Female
|
1334
|
44.2*
|
299
|
37.0*
|
1919
|
35.2*
|
679
|
31.2
|
|
Missing or other
|
50
|
1.7
|
12
|
1.5
|
41
|
0.8
|
28
|
1.3
|
|
Homeless service received, stablea
|
|
Permanent supportive housing
|
2734
|
90.6
|
411
|
50.8
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
Rapid rehousing
|
287
|
9.5
|
481
|
59.5
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
Safe haven
|
27
|
0.9
|
19
|
2.4
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
Homeless service received, not stablea
|
|
Emergency shelter
|
–
|
–
|
496
|
61.3
|
4575
|
84.0
|
–
|
–
|
|
Transitional housing
|
–
|
–
|
230
|
28.4
|
827
|
15.2
|
–
|
–
|
|
Street outreach
|
–
|
–
|
234
|
28.9
|
656
|
12.0
|
–
|
–
|
- Abbreviations: HMIS Homeless Management Information System
- Values representing less than ten individuals reported as < 10, all of which had a percent < 1.0
- * Statistically significant difference at P < 0.05 significance level, by the chi-square test. No homeless services is the referent group. All comparisons were 2X2 tables; i.e., each variable across each homeless services column was cross tabulated with the referent group
- -- Symbol for a value of zero; by definition, these cells are zero
- a Sums to > 100% because many individuals received services across different categories
