Table 5 Multivariate logistic regression models on determinants of empowerment among patients with T2DM, age group: 55–64 years

 1. men (Ref.)

1.08 ns.

(.81–1.45)

1.14 ns.

(.85–1.54)

1.11 ns

(.82–1.5)

1.13 ns

(.82–1.55)

1.29 ns

(.92–1.80)

 2. women

 1.single/widowed/divorced (Ref.)

1.29 ns.

(.95–1.76)

1.22 ns.

(.89–1.68)

1.23 ns

(.89–1.69)

0.88 ns

(.61–1.26)

0.79 ns

(.54–1.15)

 2. married/cohabiting

 1. lower education (Ref.)

1.36*

(1.02–1.82)

1.40*

(1.04–1.89)

1.48*

(1.09–2.01)

1.74***

(1.25–2.41)

1.80***

(1.28–2.52)

 2. higher education

Person-centred care (PACIC)

1.79***

(1.49–2.16)

1.70***

(1.41–2.06)

1.26*

(1.02–1.56)

1.32*

(1.05–1.65)

 Family/regular doctor

1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes

1.23 ns

(.88–1.73)

.93 ns

(.65–1.34)

.84 ns

(.58–1.23)

 Family/regular nurse

1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes

1.26 ns

(.92–1.71)

1.19 ns

(.86–1.65)

1.18 ns

(.84–1.66)

 Community

1.80***

(1.40–2.30)

1.59***

(1.22–2.06)

 Family and friends

1.46***

(1.23–1.75)

1.32**

(1.10–1.59)

 Peers

1.19*

(1.04–1.36)

1.18*

(1.03–1.36)

Diabetes-related distress

.43***

(.31–.59)

Energy/vitality

1.01**

(1.01–1.02)

Nagelkerke RSquare

n

.28

780