Table 5 Multivariate logistic regression models on determinants of empowerment among patients with T2DM, age group: 55–64 years
|
Model 1 OR (95% CI) |
Model 2 OR (95% CI) |
Model 3 OR (95% CI) |
Model 4 OR (95% CI) |
Model 5 OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: | |||||
| 1. men (Ref.) |
1.08 ns. (.81–1.45) |
1.14 ns. (.85–1.54) |
1.11 ns (.82–1.5) |
1.13 ns (.82–1.55) |
1.29 ns (.92–1.80) |
| 2. women | |||||
| Marital status | |||||
| 1.single/widowed/divorced (Ref.) |
1.29 ns. (.95–1.76) |
1.22 ns. (.89–1.68) |
1.23 ns (.89–1.69) |
0.88 ns (.61–1.26) |
0.79 ns (.54–1.15) |
| 2. married/cohabiting | |||||
| Professional education | |||||
| 1. lower education (Ref.) |
1.36* (1.02–1.82) |
1.40* (1.04–1.89) |
1.48* (1.09–2.01) |
1.74*** (1.25–2.41) |
1.80*** (1.28–2.52) |
| 2. higher education | |||||
| Person-centred care (PACIC) |
1.79*** (1.49–2.16) |
1.70*** (1.41–2.06) |
1.26* (1.02–1.56) |
1.32* (1.05–1.65) | |
| Continuity of care: | |||||
|
Family/regular doctor 1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes |
1.23 ns (.88–1.73) |
.93 ns (.65–1.34) |
.84 ns (.58–1.23) | ||
|
Family/regular nurse 1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes |
1.26 ns (.92–1.71) |
1.19 ns (.86–1.65) |
1.18 ns (.84–1.66) | ||
| Social support: | |||||
| Community |
1.80*** (1.40–2.30) |
1.59*** (1.22–2.06) | |||
| Family and friends |
1.46*** (1.23–1.75) |
1.32** (1.10–1.59) | |||
| Peers |
1.19* (1.04–1.36) |
1.18* (1.03–1.36) | |||
| Diabetes-related distress |
.43*** (.31–.59) | ||||
| Energy/vitality |
1.01** (1.01–1.02) | ||||
|
Nagelkerke RSquare n |
.28 780 | ||||