Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression models on determinants of empowerment among patients with T2DM, age group: 27–54 years
|
Model 1 OR (95% CI) |
Model 2 OR (95% CI) |
Model 3 OR (95% CI) |
Model 4 OR (95% CI) |
Model 5 OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: | |||||
| 1. men (Ref.) |
1.19 ns. (.73–1.93) |
1.19 ns. (.72–1.96) |
1.14 ns (.69–1.88) |
1.08 ns (.64–1.83) |
1.31 ns (.75–2.27) |
| 2. women | |||||
| Marital status | |||||
| 1.single/widowed/divorced (Ref.) |
1.68* (1.04–2.74) |
1.58 ns. (.96–2.6) |
1.62 ns (.98–2.69) |
1.28 ns (.72–2.28) |
1.24 ns (.69–2.25) |
| 2.married/cohabiting | |||||
| Professional education | |||||
| 1.lower education (Ref.) |
1.44 ns. (.90–2.32) |
1.43 ns (.88–2.32) |
1.63 ns (.98–2.7) |
1.73* (1.02–2.95) |
1.71 ns (.99–2.96) |
| 2.higher education | |||||
| Person-centred care (PACIC) |
1.70*** (1.27–2.27) |
1.55*** (1.14–2.11) |
1.18 ns (.82–1.69) |
1.01 ns (.69–1.49) | |
| Continuity of care: | |||||
|
Family/regular doctor 1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes |
1.12 ns (.65–1.94) |
0.98 ns (.55–1.73) |
1.22 ns (.67–2.23) | ||
|
Family/regular nurse 1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes |
2.01** (1.20–3.36) |
1.98* (1.16–3.4) |
1.85* (1.06–3.23) | ||
| Social support: | |||||
| Community |
1.55* (1.04–2.3) |
1.59* (1.06–2.39) | |||
| Family and friends |
1.43* (1.05–1.93) |
1.20 ns (.87–1.66) | |||
| Peers |
1.17 ns (.95–1.44) |
1.15 ns (.92–1.43) | |||
| Diabetes-related distress |
.50** (.31–.81) | ||||
| Energy/vitality |
1.02* (1.00–1.03) | ||||
| Nagelkerke RSquare |
.29 280 | ||||
| n | |||||