Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression models on determinants of empowerment among patients with T2DM, age group: 27–54 years

Sex:

 1. men (Ref.)

1.19 ns.

(.73–1.93)

1.19 ns.

(.72–1.96)

1.14 ns

(.69–1.88)

1.08 ns

(.64–1.83)

1.31 ns

(.75–2.27)

 2. women

Marital status

 1.single/widowed/divorced (Ref.)

1.68*

(1.04–2.74)

1.58 ns.

(.96–2.6)

1.62 ns

(.98–2.69)

1.28 ns

(.72–2.28)

1.24 ns

(.69–2.25)

 2.married/cohabiting

Professional education

 1.lower education (Ref.)

1.44 ns.

(.90–2.32)

1.43 ns

(.88–2.32)

1.63 ns

(.98–2.7)

1.73*

(1.02–2.95)

1.71 ns

(.99–2.96)

 2.higher education

Person-centred care (PACIC)

1.70***

(1.27–2.27)

1.55***

(1.14–2.11)

1.18 ns

(.82–1.69)

1.01 ns

(.69–1.49)

Continuity of care:

 Family/regular doctor

1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes

1.12 ns

(.65–1.94)

0.98 ns

(.55–1.73)

1.22 ns

(.67–2.23)

 Family/regular nurse

1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes

2.01**

(1.20–3.36)

1.98*

(1.16–3.4)

1.85*

(1.06–3.23)

Social support:

 Community

1.55*

(1.04–2.3)

1.59*

(1.06–2.39)

 Family and friends

1.43*

(1.05–1.93)

1.20 ns

(.87–1.66)

 Peers

1.17 ns

(.95–1.44)

1.15 ns

(.92–1.43)

Diabetes-related distress

.50**

(.31–.81)

Energy/vitality

1.02*

(1.00–1.03)

Nagelkerke RSquare

.29

280

n